PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Chances of being evicted with Leasehold.

I have saved up enough for either :

a) a decent one or two bedroom flat (Leasehold)
b) a run down house in a poor area (Freehold)

Obviously I would prefer a Freehold but I would consider a leasehold if I knew there was some security. For example, my income has been guaranteed for the past few years but things don't look so great moving forwards and I could end up on zero hours contracts etc without guaranteed income.

I would be paying cash for the flat so can somebody give me an idea which scenarios can lead to you being evicted from a leasehold flat even if you have paid cash for the leasehold?

Also one last unrelated question. If I bought a house where you had to go down two steps to get into the kitchen how hard would that property be to sell on the market? My Dad said it would put off nearly all buyers with kids, or disabled people etc.

Any advice on either of those points would be appreciated

Comments

  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Leasehold flat for cash-Unlikely. But you'd need to keep up with bills/service charges/ground rent to avoid potential problems...

    Run down house-More likely assuming you needed a mortgage. Plus if the worst happens how are you going to finance improvements?

    The step thing would probably put off some potential buyers but i wouldn't say all...
  • KiKi
    KiKi Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 28 March 2016 at 5:50PM
    karljt2013 wrote: »
    I have saved up enough for either :

    a) a decent one or two bedroom flat (Leasehold)
    b) a run down house in a poor area (Freehold)

    Obviously I would prefer a Freehold but I would consider a leasehold if I knew there was some security. For example, my income has been guaranteed for the past few years but things don't look so great moving forwards and I could end up on zero hours contracts etc without guaranteed income.

    I would be paying cash for the flat so can somebody give me an idea which scenarios can lead to you being evicted from a leasehold flat even if you have paid cash for the leasehold?

    It would be very unlikely that you'd be evicted, you'd have to be taken to court, and only if you broke the lease and were outstanding a lot of money - it's a drastic action to take. Presumably if you couldn't afford leasehold charges then you'd have problems paying other bills anyway, so you'd be looking for additional work. Hundreds of thousands of people must be on leaseholds, so don't worry about it too much.

    And personally, location over property every time!

    Also one last unrelated question. If I bought a house where you had to go down two steps to get into the kitchen how hard would that property be to sell on the market? My Dad said it would put off nearly all buyers with kids, or disabled people etc.

    It would limit *some* people (for example, wheelchair users), but then if you need a wheelchair you need to consider a lot more things such as doorway widths, hallway widths, using main stairs etc.

    Personally I think it's nice to have a room or two on a slightly different level. If you're in an area with a lot of converted flats, a number of them are likely to be split level. I think it's a nice feature, certainly wouldn't bother me.
    ' <-- See that? It's called an apostrophe. It does not mean "hey, look out, here comes an S".
  • Kyresa
    Kyresa Posts: 1,534 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    There are always 21 day forfeiture clauses in leases so make sure you keep up with service charges if you do go leasehold !
  • bouicca21
    bouicca21 Posts: 6,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I was brought up in a house with a step down into the kitchen - which was a side extension to a 1930s end terrace house. The house has appreciated in value in line with other properties in the area.
  • Be extremely thorough with checks in relation to potential works that might be required. If extensive - and expensive - works are carried out you'll have to pay towards them. Failure to pay is likely to be a breach of the lease and could lead to forfeiture. Drastic action but it does happen.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It typically takes a long, long time to lose security of tenure in leasehold properties. Whilst the legal structure is based on leases, they have a status that is in many respects - though not all - closer to buying than renting (which is why most people casually talk about buying flats rather than leasing them)


    Firstly, the largest on-going cost is usually, of course, your mortgage payments, not the ground rent or service charge.


    So it is a bit odd that you are focusing so much on the ground rent and service charge. Because one presumes that if you can't pay that, you certainly wouldn't be able to pay your mortgage payment anyway and so would already be on the road to repossession.


    If you mean you are paying 100% in cash for the property, if you are worried about the charges then either your income must potentially be close to zero at times (in which case, what about utility bills, council tax, if the boiler breaks or the roof of the house leaks) or the charges must be out of control.


    Secondly, although in theory freeholders can apply to end long leases on non-payment of valid charges, the legal process takes months and typically is not actually pursued for some time anyway as the cost relative to the charges is often initially of a similar scale. If people are in financial difficulty and selling, it's often cheaper and easier for the freeholder to wait and get the charges around the time of transfer.


    Thirdly, what usually happens in practice is that if you don't pay valid charges and the freeholder moves to legal proceedings, the mortgage lender starts to pay it in order to protect their own interest in the property. That gets added to the mortgage and they try to collect it from you instead.


    So typically when buying leasehold the thing to check is the basis of the ground rent and service charges, any upcoming major works, and how well the block is managed.


    If you think that you can't necessarily finance these modest charges, you probably can't take the risk of any kind of purchase because you have no contingency.
  • So it is a bit odd that you are focusing so much on the ground rent and service charge. Because one presumes that if you can't pay that, you certainly wouldn't be able to pay your mortgage payment anyway and so would already be on the road to repossession.

    If you mean you are paying 100% in cash for the property, if you are worried about the charges then either your income must potentially be close to zero at times (in which case, what about utility bills, council tax, if the boiler breaks or the roof of the house leaks) or the charges must be out of control.

    I am focusing on ground rent and service charges because I will be paying cash for the flat but things don't look good financially after that. I haven't saved all this money to hand it all over to a greedy buy to let landlord, Thats why I want to buy somewhere.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Perhaps you need to secure some employment before buying somewhere?


    Renting for 6 months would give you ample time to pass any probationary periods and secure a mortgage.


    This would in turn let you buy a nice house.
  • benjus
    benjus Posts: 5,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Read this:

    http://www.flat-living.co.uk/advice/507-forfeiture-of-your-lease

    In short, it's a long, drawn out process and getting as far as forfeiting the lease is rare.
    Let's settle this like gentlemen: armed with heavy sticks
    On a rotating plate, with spikes like Flash Gordon
    And you're Peter Duncan; I gave you fair warning
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.