We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Currys broke tv in transit advise please
Options
Comments
-
ThumbRemote wrote: »The age of the TV is irrelevant. This is not a SoGA replacement, it's bound by the terms of their care plan. These state:
"If we cannot readily and economically repair your product you will be given a voucher to obtain a replacement product in one of our stores. The value will be based on an equivalent or similar specification product up to a maximum of your original product purchase price."
ie in this case a new-for-old replacement.0 -
You're entitled to be put back in the position you were before they broke the TV, ie, having a used 8 year old TV, or it's value. I think £255 is fairly generous for an 8 year old 42" Samsung.
The current text from the Curry's website is:
"Key benefits- Protection against breakdown or mishap
- We’ll fix or replace with new
- All parts, labour and call out charges covered
- Unlimited repairs
So if I were paying £7 a month for a policy which stated they would fix or replace with new I would expect them to fix it or replace it with a new one of at least equivalent standard.
It depends entirely on what the terms of the original agreement say.0 -
But as already mentioned by others, £255 is more than enough to pay for a 40" or 42" TV from LG or JVC (and some of these are "smart TV's). I would be very surprised if a TV that was 8 years old was of a better specification of one of these sets .0
-
The problem with that is that the terms on the website are for the current terms, they have had numerous changes over the last 8 years, they used to be tech guys, then whatever happens and now care plan. The terms have most likely changed a lot and the ones listed on the website are for the current policies not the old ones which would have had their own set of terms.
Even if that is what is specified in the original terms you can quite easily get a TV of the same size or bigger and with much higher specifications for the £255 offered so they haven't breached the contract.
If this was simply a case of unrepairable I would say the £255 is completely fair, it is just my personal opinion that with them damaging it they should offer a bit more as a good will gesture than sticking to the policy, but even then I'm thinking a max of £50 extra probably more like £20-£30 to make it fair not going into the hundreds.0 -
Even if that is what is specified in the original terms you can quite easily get a TV of the same size or bigger and with much higher specifications for the £255 offered so they haven't breached the contract.
If this was simply a case of unrepairable I would say the £255 is completely fair, it is just my personal opinion that with them damaging it they should offer a bit more as a good will gesture than sticking to the policy, but even then I'm thinking a max of £50 extra probably more like £20-£30 to make it fair not going into the hundreds.
Assuming the terms as per the website apply then to meet the contract the can't just offer £255 they have to supply a new TV.0 -
Assuming the terms as per the website apply then to meet the contract the can't just offer £255 they have to supply a new TV.0
-
And if the care plan payments were saved instead of paying for the plan, you would now have nearly 700 in the bank, could buy a new tv for the same price they are offering a voucher for and still have 450 to do with what you want.
Care plans are a total waste of money0 -
No, as already posted above the terms say the following "If we cannot readily and economically repair your product you will be given a voucher to obtain a replacement product in one of our stores. The value will be based on an equivalent or similar specification product up to a maximum of your original product purchase price."
This a really good point and I don't believe that Curry's are acting unreasonably in offering £255 in this case.
However I think that I would try to extract a bigger offer from Curry’s. My argument would be along the lines that the brand is important as is the size of the TV. Given this Curry’s should supply an equivalent TV in size and brand. Looking on their website the nearest equivalent Samsung TV is priced at £399. (Samsung UE43J5600 Smart 43" LED TV) hence I would argue that this is the nearest equivalent TV which they supply and therefore the offer they are making should be for this TV.
I don’t think they will agree, but they may up their offer.0 -
MoneySavingNovice wrote: »This a really good point and I don't believe that Curry's are acting unreasonably in offering £255 in this case.
However I think that I would try to extract a bigger offer from Curry’s. My argument would be along the lines that the brand is important as is the size of the TV. Given this Curry’s should supply an equivalent TV in size and brand. Looking on their website the nearest equivalent Samsung TV is priced at £399. (Samsung UE43J5600 Smart 43" LED TV) hence I would argue that this is the nearest equivalent TV which they supply and therefore the offer they are making should be for this TV.
I don’t think they will agree, but they may up their offer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards