We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Harder now for 1st time buyers?

1679111222

Comments

  • If it's getting harder, why are more people doing it?

    571084-System__Resources__Big_Image-632192.gif

    The fact that more people are doing would in itself make it more difficult. That should be obvious. If nobody was buying houses prices would drop.
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35603893 According to above article it fell to 63% but there was a slight rise last year.


    I wonder how much of that rise can be attributed to the recent government schemes like Help to Buy or shared ownership schemes.
  • Which is why it defies logic that the current young generation are having a baby boom.


    Are they? Not that I've noticed.
  • looknohands
    looknohands Posts: 390 Forumite
    Baby boom would imply increasing birthrate, I'm 30 years old and only have a handful of acquaintances with more than one child. Not sure where your stats from but in my area it seems to be a declining birth rate..
  • Also, look at how well the one child per couple policy is working out in China. You need a decent sized younger generation to support the economy in the future. That means that on average, each person should be having two children.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I wonder how much of that rise can be attributed to the recent government schemes like Help to Buy or shared ownership schemes.
    This link http://visual.ons.gov.uk/uk-perspectives-housing-and-home-ownership-in-the-uk/ shows an increase in FTBs in 2011.
  • ukcarper wrote: »


    It also shows a sharp drop in 2007 and that in 2013 the number of FTBs had still not got back to the level it was at in 1980.
  • racing_blue
    racing_blue Posts: 961 Forumite
    Boler1985 spent 5 years slaving away in Qatar (or wherever) to afford it. That's one way to do it.

    Another route is to secure a difficult and high paying job in, for example, London finance. Or generate capital gains through a business, with all the ideas, hard work and risk that entails.

    People who are not willing to do the spadework can still live in London, they can rent properties from people who were. Or they can buy elsewhere in the UK.

    Spadework in this context is not just hard work - it is smart work & often unpopular or uncomfortable work. Agency, consultancy, off shore or ex pat, many professions have a "game" which can be played for a few years to maximise wealth accumulation

    That's what I think anyway
  • Boler1985 spent 5 years slaving away in Qatar (or wherever) to afford it. That's one way to do it.

    Another route is to secure a difficult and high paying job in, for example, London finance. Or generate capital gains through a business, with all the ideas, hard work and risk that entails.

    People who are not willing to do the spadework can still live in London, they can rent properties from people who were. Or they can buy elsewhere in the UK.

    Spadework in this context is not just hard work - it is smart work & often unpopular or uncomfortable work. Agency, consultancy, off shore or ex pat, many professions have a "game" which can be played for a few years to maximise wealth accumulation

    That's what I think anyway


    Get real. Not everyone can be an investment banker. What would London do without doctors and teachers? You think the landlords of those doctors and teachers living in London acquired those properties through "spade work"? No, most likely they were just in the right place at the right time.

    The point is, there is no longer any real correlation between "spade work" and wealth. And that is precisely the problem.
  • looknohands
    looknohands Posts: 390 Forumite
    It is easier to progress in careers within the private sector in London in general, staff movement is higher so opportunities / pay rises open up more often. There's so much work that contracting will earn you a lot more money. I remotely contract for clients in London so don't even need to live there but get paid around 4 times more than I would if I did similar job in-house in my home city. There is plenty of money to earn in / from London is the point I think?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.