Ncp

Coupon-mad

Walaboobah wrote: »

NCP have informed POPLA they do not wish to contest the appeal so job done on that one.

However, I have now received a rejection from NCP for my appeal against the NTK with a different Parking ticket number on it and a 2nd POPLA code. It's the same incident, I'm assuming someone had removed the ticket from my windscreen, therefore NCP issued a 2nd ticket two days later. The car had not moved from the spot it was parked in.

Should I appeal using the same points as outlined above for the previous POPLA Appeal and then add a bit about the duplicate ticket or not bother mentioning that?

It's a separate PCN so I say yes, appeal it.

Walaboobah

Right I'll submit a 2nd Appeal to POPLA then, thanks

Walaboobah

Is this a valid NTK?

Umkomaas

You need to check it pedantically against Schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. If it doesn't meet the requirements word-for-word, keeper liability doesn't apply, and you have to bring that to POPLA's attention in your appeal 'Janet and John' style.

http://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/keeper-liability/

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4/enacted

Almost every PPCs NtKs fail to meet the strict requirements of PoFA, so get checking and pick up on any and every failure in the one you've received.

Castle

Walaboobah wrote: »

Is this a valid NTK?

No!
1) It has to arrive within 56 days and given that the date of posting was 31st March 2016 then that's the 57th day after the parking event.
2) No creditor specified on the NTK.
3) Of course you are not "required" to do anything despite their claim.

Reading the NTK it doesn't state that the RK is liable at the moment.

Coupon-mad

It is very obviously not a POFA NTK! Who does it say is liable? The driver only...

Walaboobah

Castle wrote: »

No!
1) It has to arrive within 56 days and given that the date of posting was 31st March 2016 then that's the 57th day after the parking event.
2) No creditor specified on the NTK.
3) Of course you are not "required" to do anything despite their claim.

Reading the NTK it doesn't state that the RK is liable at the moment.

That's what I thought, it appears they forgot it was a leap year, oh dear! :T

Walaboobah

Thanks all for the advice, will do some further research this evening before submitting my POPLA appeal

Walaboobah

and 2nd one now not being contested by NCP. The POPLA result says they are withdrawing it as a gesture of goodwill, the same as the other one relating to the same Parking event!

I would love to see some stats on how many people just pay the invoice when they receive them! It must run into millions of pounds each year!

Thanks all for your help!