We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Fidelity ISA
Comments
-
I don't think it is important.Rheumatoid wrote: »I presume it is important to determine whether the funds I hold are clean before changing. Any idea how I can determine whether this is the case?
The fee is 0.25% with Cavendish and 0.35% for direct so you save by using CavendishRemember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Im also with Cavendish. No probs.
Back to the OP, why not invest an extra £50 (or however much your annual charge is) cash into your largest fund, and let them take it from that, leaving your fund size intact.illegitimi non carborundum0 -
Im also with Cavendish. No probs.
Back to the OP, why not invest an extra £50 (or however much your annual charge is) cash into your largest fund, and let them take it from that, leaving your fund size intact.
It doesnt work like that. You can hold cash in a 'cash fund' in the account, but unless that is your largest holding, they will sell sell units in the largest one.
C0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards