We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Viktor Rolf Secret Service Are you a member?
Comments
-
Hoof_Hearted wrote: »It's very important to praise a company on your first post. It sounds like one of the most generous and trustworthy companies ever.
You replied to a post after a whole year!0 -
No, they replied to a post that was written 18 minutes earlier and which has now been removed.fleshandbone wrote: »You replied to a post after a whole year!0 -
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »No, they replied to a post that was written 18 minutes earlier and which has now been removed.
Hello Shaun, please recheck I think you may have made a mistake.0 -
fleshandbone wrote: »Hello Shaun, please recheck I think you may have made a mistake.
No mistake.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:IKkl3jugwckJ:forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php%3Fp%3D72026390+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
The post that Hoof hearted replied to was written by mrspee123 at 8.38am today.0 -
The removed post wasn't here when I posted, so in actual fact you were wrong in saying I was wrong #Justsaying0
-
You really should read posts more carefully. I clearly stated that a post had been removed.fleshandbone wrote: »The removed post wasn't here when I posted, so in actual fact you were wrong in saying I was wrong #Justsaying
I didn't say that you were wrong, I simply stated that Hoof Hearted was not replying to a year old post.shaun_from_Africa wrote: »No, they replied to a post that was written 18 minutes earlier and which has now been removed.0 -
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »You really should read posts more carefully. I clearly stated that a post had been removed.
I didn't say that you were wrong, I simply stated that Hoof Hearted was not replying to a year old post.
You implied I was wrong.
Anyway no point in arguing with someone who wont admit there clear error.
Have a great day.0 -
It doesn't take a genius to work out that the post that HH was replying to was no longer there especially considering the very next comment from DoaM was also replying to the same, now deleted post.Hoof_Hearted wrote: »It's very important to praise a company on your first post. It sounds like one of the most generous and trustworthy companies ever.And resurrecting a year-old thread to do so is certainly not an obvious :spam: tactic.
0 -
"there clear error". Love it!fleshandbone wrote: »You implied I was wrong.
Anyway no point in arguing with someone who wont admit there clear error.
Have a great day.0 -
There is no dispute that knowingly or unknowingly, you were wrong.fleshandbone wrote: »You implied I was wrong.
Anyway no point in arguing with someone who wont admit there clear error.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards