We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
renting out a flat in your basement
Options
Comments
-
-
Seems daft tp spend money physically converting it without dividing the utilities up with separate metering for each flat. Should your plans change in a few years, you'd never be able to sell it as an independent unit with that bodged arrangement.
And, with the wrong tenants, your gas and leccy bils are potentially open-ended.No free lunch, and no free laptop0 -
.....
You say it can't be an AST but it seems to fulfill all the requirements on the Government website:
"Assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs)
The most common form of tenancy is an AST. Most new tenancies are automatically this type..... etc etc etc
See HA 1988 Schedule 1(10)
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/schedule/1/part/I/crossheading/resident-landlords
(Schedule 1 lists those tenancies that cannot be Assured Tenancies: An AST is but a special form of AT)Resident landlords
10 (1 A tenancy in respect of which the following conditions are fulfilled—
(a) that the dwelling-house forms part only of a building and, except in a case where the dwelling-house also forms part of a flat, the building is not a purpose-built block of flats; and
(b) that, subject to Part III of this Schedule, the tenancy was granted by an individual who, at the time when the tenancy was granted, occupied as his only or principal home another dwelling-house which,—
(i) in the case mentioned in paragraph (a) above, also forms part of the flat; or
(ii) in any other case, also forms part of the building; and ,,,,,,,
Please don;t take my word for it, check with a solicitor who is expert in landlord/tenant law (Most are perfectly nice people but don't understand this area..) . Or ask the same question over here...
http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?3-Residential-Letting-Questions0 -
Thanks so much for all the advice. We're going to speak to the mortgage company and hope they don't flip out!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards