We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

S & S ISA and new £5000 dividend allowance

I have a query re the new £5000 dividend allowance:

My understanding is that the 10% dividend tax credit within Stocks & Shares ISAs was abolished in 2004 and that therefore dividends received from funds within an ISA are taxed at source at the basic rate (so the only benefit of holding equity funds in an ISA is for higher-rate taxpayers who are exempt from any higher-rate tax).

Will dividends still be taxed at basic rate in an ISA after April 2016? As far as I know the government has not announced any changes to the treatment of dividends in an ISA. Their website page re the new dividend allowance confusingly says "... dividends received on shares held in an Individual Savings Account (ISA), will continue to be tax free"- but they are not tax-free!!

If the treatment of dividends within an ISA is not changing then would it not make sense to remove the ISA wrapper in order to benefit from the new £5000 dividend allowance?
«1

Comments

  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 6 January 2016 at 7:47PM
    The amount of dividend payments is totally unaffected by the introduction of the new dividend allowance. You get paid the same amount of dividend whether your investment is held in an ISA or not.

    You already pay absolutely no tax of any sort for anything you hold in an ISA. There's therefore absolutely nothing to gain by un-wrapping your existing ISA investment. But you can lose by un-wrapping.

    EDIT: if you want a Bowlhead lecture on the matter: http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=69856282&postcount=10
  • OK thanks Archi.

    So the following statement from LearnMoney.co.uk is incorrect ??

    "In 2004 the 10% dividend tax credit within ISAs was abolished. This means if you are a basic rate taxpayer there is no advantage to holding shares in an ISA as you would pay the same 10% tax (on dividends) if the shares were held outside the ISA wrapper."
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    OK thanks Archi.

    So the following statement from LearnMoney.co.uk is incorrect ??

    "In 2004 the 10% dividend tax credit within ISAs was abolished. This means if you are a basic rate taxpayer there is no advantage to holding shares in an ISA as you would pay the same 10% tax (on dividends) if the shares were held outside the ISA wrapper."

    Yes it is incorrect overall. But to clarify, it is correct in part. There is no benefit for dividends as a basic rate taxpayer but there is benefit for capital gains. There is also a benefit if you move into a higher tax bracket. It's poor advice to say not to use a tax wrapper without spelling out the downsides.

    If you decide an ISA isn't worth the bother and keep your investments unwrapped then a few years down the line have £100k invested you'll be a bit stuck if you need to sell or your tax rate increased.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 6 January 2016 at 10:30PM
    Yes, LearnMoney.co.uk, whoever they are, is incorrect. It should be worth reading that Bowlhead lecture.

    EDIT: I had a quick look at learnmoney.co.uk and almost instantly concluded they are stuck in the past and not concerned with providing current information. For example:
    At the moment up to a maximum of £3,600 can be paid into a Cash ISA in any one tax year, which runs from the official tax year date of April to April. However from 6th April 2010 this amount will be raised to £5,100.
  • Laughing_Boy
    Laughing_Boy Posts: 25 Forumite
    edited 7 January 2016 at 5:39PM
    Yes I am aware that ISA's provide protection from CGT and for higher rate taxpayers. Also interest from bond funds is tax-free. But I have long thought that dividends are taxed at 10% ...
    Archi_Bald wrote: »
    You already pay absolutely no tax of any sort for anything you hold in an ISA.

    Well it's not only Learnmoney.co.uk which is "wrong". Even the government's advice website https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/articles/stocks-and-shares-isas says:

    "dividends are taxed at 10% ..." so a Stocks & Shares ISA " provides no benefit to basic rate taxpayer"

    and

    "Apart from dividend income (paid with 10% tax already deducted which can’t be reclaimed), the rest of the income is tax-free"

    and http://www.which.co.uk/money/tax/guides/tax-on-savings-and-investments/dividend-tax says :

    "Dividends are automatically taxed (called 'taxed at source') at the rate of 10%. ... The 10% deduction is to be abolished from the start of the 2016-17 tax year. Instead, investors will receive a £5,000 allowance, meaning the first £5,000 of dividend income will be tax free."

    So the fact that the 10% deduction is being abolished answers my original question.
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Did you actually read the Bowlhead lecture?
  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 5,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    In 2004, not only did the tax credit become irreclaimable, but the government stopped taking the tax off dividends. To deal with the additional tax higher rate taxpayers pay, a notional tax was added to the dividend then taken off again.
    But really Bowlhead tells it much better than me
    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • Yes I read & understood Bowlhead's post.

    It seems odd that the government's own information states "dividends are taxed at 10%".

    Perhaps they are referring to corporation tax.
  • colsten
    colsten Posts: 17,596 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    It seems odd that the government's own information states "dividends are taxed at 10%".
    Have you got a link please?
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If you get more than £5000 divis then you will have to pay more tax so they would be better off in an ISA but then it may be too late to shelter excess divis.
    Also correct me if im wrong but isnt divis classed as income and therefore any excess over 5k could move you into a higher tax bracket?
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.