We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
TV intermittently faulty after 5 months - replace?
hieveryone
Posts: 3,865 Forumite
Hi
I'm aware this question probably asked a 1000 times, but I'm overdue my baby, severely fed up and just need a quicky answer so hopefully I can get this sorted.
- Bought TV from Currys (30th August 2015)
- Paid on credit card (in case that makes any difference)
- Intermittent faults (lines on screen)
- Currys say contact their 'Know How' department for a repair.
Can I refuse a repair and request a replacement TV?
Thank you
I'm aware this question probably asked a 1000 times, but I'm overdue my baby, severely fed up and just need a quicky answer so hopefully I can get this sorted.
- Bought TV from Currys (30th August 2015)
- Paid on credit card (in case that makes any difference)
- Intermittent faults (lines on screen)
- Currys say contact their 'Know How' department for a repair.
Can I refuse a repair and request a replacement TV?
Thank you
Bought is to buy. Brought is to bring.
0
Comments
-
Quicky answer? No.
Currys get to choose what remedy they go down if they can't prove its not a manufacturing defect.0 -
Quicky answer? No.
Currys get to choose what remedy they go down if they can't prove its not a manufacturing defect.
Thank you - I'm more confused now - I thought that the 'Consumer Rights Act 2015 meant this (copied from which.com)
Is the wording of this that the retailer can choose whether to repair or replace and not me?
Faults within six months
Within the first six months of purchase, it's up to the retailer to prove that the TV wasn't faulty at the point of sale - it's not up to you to prove that it was.
The retailer can choose either to replace or repair the telly. They'll usually choose the cheaper option as long as they can show the option you want would be disproportionately expensive.
You can use our letter to claim for a repair or a replacement TV.
If you're having problems and the shop won't repair or replace your TV then it should be reported to your local Trading Standards department as the shop is breaching your statutory rights.
It's worth telling the shop that you're going to do this as this could mean your complaint is then dealt with.
Bought is to buy. Brought is to bring.0 -
Your purchasedate is under the older SOGA not CRA .0
-
-
Pretty much spot on.0
-
-
Your still not entitled to a replacement. They get to choose the remedy not you. The new CCR's give the consumer a definite 30 days to choose the remedy where as before it was undefined. After 5 months it's always been the retailers choice.
You will not find anyone that gives a replacement after 5 months, even the fabled John lewis will repair when they can so no point blaming Currys.0 -
Your still not entitled to a replacement. They get to choose the remedy not you. The new CCR's give the consumer a definite 30 days to choose the remedy where as before it was undefined. After 5 months it's always been the retailers choice.
You will not find anyone that gives a replacement after 5 months, even the fabled John lewis will repair when they can so no point blaming Currys.
Ok done, thank you, that's what I needed to check.
Unfortunate timing with being due a new baby etc - typical!
Thanks for all your help.
Bought is to buy. Brought is to bring.0 -
Your still not entitled to a replacement. They get to choose the remedy not you. The new CCR's give the consumer a definite 30 days to choose the remedy where as before it was undefined. After 5 months it's always been the retailers choice.
You will not find anyone that gives a replacement after 5 months, even the fabled John lewis will repair when they can so no point blaming Currys.
But JL's 5 year guarantee will give you a like for like replacement if a repair is uneconomic, whereas Currys would likely give a proportionate refund.
Sister's friend was dumped by her husband and left with a supersized plasma tv. More than 4 years after purchase it broke, plasmas aren't made any more. JL gave her a brand new tv of the same size and nearest specification and a cash refund of nearly £600 because the new tv was substantially cheaper than the "cutting edge/top dollar" model the husband had bought.
Guess where I bought a new tv from the week before Christmas :T0 -
Your still not entitled to a replacement. They get to choose the remedy not you.
But surely Bris, you can agree that it does no harm whatsoever to express a preferred remedy?
Section 48B of The Sale of Goods Act says, in my opinion, that the buyer can choose the remedy but cannot force the seller to supply a disproportionate remedy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards