We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking on the Pavement.

JP08
JP08 Posts: 851 Forumite
BBC article. Parking on the pavement may be made illegal unless signposted (as per London only at present).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34988833

I can see it causing major parking issues in some areas, but I also see a woman on her mobility scooter regularly unable to get along the pavement of our road - especially over the summer when the local riverside pub does a roaring food trade and people can't be bothered to park on the wider section 100yds away. At least such a law could confine parking to areas where the pavements are suitable.

Personally I like the Japanese approach to parking - you can't have a car unless you have somewhere to park it off street (which could be a communal car park before people start yelling their house has nowhere to park a car !).
«13

Comments

  • roddydogs
    roddydogs Posts: 7,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This old chestnut again.
  • JP08
    JP08 Posts: 851 Forumite
    It is an old chestnut - even the article says so. But it is also a topical old chestnut as the bill concerned is on it's second reading in parliament today - which, admittedly, puts it a long way from becoming law ...

    http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2015-16/pavementparkingprotectionofvulnerablepedestrians.html
  • ic
    ic Posts: 3,488 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If this was imposed, locally we'd have chaos or the council would have to spend a fortune installing new road markings and signs to allow the existing parking. If mounting the pavement is a problem, then it would be better to put in single/double lines to prevent the parking in problem areas. I'd also like to see wider use of red routes as in London to keep key stretches of roads clear.
  • The counter argument is that on a narrow road people have to park on the pavement. Especially if there is a school on the road, though not my road. So some narrow roads are hell when the cars cannot park on the pavement as they do not have the extra space that extends from the pavement to the road.
    When you look into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you. Nietzsche

    Please note that at no point during this work was the kettle ever put out of commission and no chavs were harmed during the making of this post.
  • JP08
    JP08 Posts: 851 Forumite
    The counter argument is that on a narrow road people have to park on the pavement.

    What it would mean is that they could only park down one side of the road. If the pavement is too narrow for a car to be partly on and still allow the passage of a mobility scooter then a car should not be parked there.

    Nobody "has" to park in a particular place / road. There is always an option. Ok - the options might not be very nice - live without a car, park further away, pay for a parking space in a communal facility or where someone has spare space -, but they are options.
  • derrick
    derrick Posts: 7,424 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 December 2015 at 10:15AM
    JP08 wrote: »
    BBC article. Parking on the pavement may be made illegal unless signposted (as per London only at present).
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-34988833


    It's already illegal ,councils/police just don't enforce:-

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/waiting-and-parking-238-to-252

    Rule 244

    You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London, and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it. Parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs.
    Law GL(GP)A sect 15

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/general-rules-techniques-and-advice-for-all-drivers-and-riders-103-to-158
    Rule 145

    You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.
    Laws HA 1835 sect 72 & RTA 1988 sect 34





    And for the pedants re "HC not a legal document": https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/introduction

    Wording of The Highway Code

    Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, given penalty points on your licence or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/MUST NOT’. In addition, the rule includes an abbreviated reference to the legislation which creates the offence.

    .
    Don`t steal - the Government doesn`t like the competition


  • That quote from the HC just proves what the OP says.

    i.e. that it is only in London at present.
  • derrick wrote: »
    It's already illegal ,councils/police just don't enforce:-



    Rule 244

    You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London, and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it. Parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs.


    Rule 145

    You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.


    Wording of The Highway Code

    Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, given penalty points on your licence or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/MUST NOT’. In addition, the rule includes an abbreviated reference to the legislation which creates the offence.

    .

    Why have you posted legislation relating to London. Elsewhere in the country you'd need an actual necessary or wilful obstruction to take action.

    As for your other link about driving elsewhere than on a road. Do you know the footpath is a road?
  • The counter argument is that on a narrow road people have to park on the pavement. Especially if there is a school on the road, though not my road. So some narrow roads are hell when the cars cannot park on the pavement as they do not have the extra space that extends from the pavement to the road.



    No, they don't HAVE to. They could park somewhere else.
  • robbies_gal
    robbies_gal Posts: 7,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    we lve in a cul de sac -the end of the road is very narrow and it would block vehicles coming through if they didnt park halfway on pavement-i do get its frustrating for pedestrians but we dont have alot of people walking down our road
    What goes around-comes around
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.