We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking firm is member of IPC. What's procedure?
Options
Comments
-
If a solicitor is preparing their papers for them, it's their bread and butter, but Gladstones have prepared some howlers which cost their PPC client dear, not only in terms of losing their court case and its immediate costs, but the defendant's cost plus the likely Gladstones charges for 'professional services rendered'!
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/gladstones-solicitors-bungle-case.html
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/hopeless-solicitors-gladstones-bungle.htmlPlease note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
The PPC can invoke 'RK liability' if and only if they have complied with the statutory requirements under PoFA Schedule 4. Even now, four years on, it is surprising how many PPCs fail to do so.
Whilst it is now too late for the OP's mother to "name the driver" and transfer any liability which already exists, the OP should nonetheless carefully review the original letters sent by the PPC, including dates sent, and carefully cross-reference them against the statutory requirements under PoFA to see whether the latter have been complied with.
If not, then "no RK liability" plus "not the driver" would defeat the claim, assuming both are accepted by the judge.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards