We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Need advice house insurance refused 81 year old man dying of cancer!

1356

Comments

  • peachyprice
    peachyprice Posts: 22,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    hollydays wrote: »
    The worst insurance company I've ever dealt with was Liverpool Victoria, it wasn't them was it ?


    OP said it was Aviva.
    Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks, missed that.
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 November 2015 at 11:30AM
    This is potentially a much more involved issue than you are presenting.
    There will be a clause in the insurance policy no doubt relating to maintenance of the property. If the mortar has shown signs of needing repointing or there has been indicators eg damp or movement , I don't think the insurance company may be to blame , but I would be more concerned about the stability of the house. Are the roof tiles in good order , as this is the point where the wall collapsed -damper mortar there maybe?
    What advice have they offered your uncle?

    Consulting a structural engineer asap should be his priority surely?
  • I agree with the above, making the house safe should be priority number 1. Dealing with the insurance company can come later.

    Get a structural engineer and decent builder in to get the house secured and then go to the obmudsman with the insurance issues.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • Having just read through Aviva's home insurance policy, it does say that it does not cover damage caused by faulty materials, poor design or workmanship.

    Even though it has stood for 60 years, there is no way a structure of that age should suddenly collapse whatever the weather, so poor construction could well be the main factor here, which would make your fight with the insurance company a tricky one.

    As a matter of urgency you need to get a report from a structural engineer on the cause of the collapse, and the risk to the rest of the building. If (s)he confirms what Aviva are saying then it is likely that you are not going to get far with the insurance company, but if your own surveyer comes up with something else like subsidence then you will have a much stronger case to take back to Aviva and if nessasary the ombudsman.
  • Even though it has stood for 60 years, there is no way a structure of that age should suddenly collapse whatever the weather, so poor construction could well be the main factor here, which would make your fight with the insurance company a tricky one.

    But as the link I showed earlier stated. poor construction should only be a reason to refuse to pay out if the insured person could have been reasonably expected to know about that poor construction.

    The house I currently live in is about 45 years old and I have lived there for 12 years so if the builder used substandard materials or poor building practices, how would I be expected to know about this?
    Even if I actually saw the house being built, I'm not a builder myself so wouldn't have a clue if the correct standards were being met.

    Knowingly failing to disclose material facts is a legitimate reason for an insurer to refuse to pay out. Unknowingly failing to declare those facts isn't.
  • But as the link I showed earlier stated. poor construction should only be a reason to refuse to pay out if the insured person could have been reasonably expected to know about that poor construction.

    The house I currently live in is about 45 years old and I have lived there for 12 years so if the builder used substandard materials or poor building practices, how would I be expected to know about this?
    Even if I actually saw the house being built, I'm not a builder myself so wouldn't have a clue if the correct standards were being met.

    Knowingly failing to disclose material facts is a legitimate reason for an insurer to refuse to pay out. Unknowingly failing to declare those facts isn't.

    I agree you would not know this, my house is 75 years old and there is no way I can tell if there is a latent defect waiting to show itself next week. The issue is that the policy clearly states that it does not cover building defects, so would that not give Aviva a legitimate reason not to pay out?

    Different polices provide varying levels of cover, and if I don't take out a policy that covers hidden defects then surely I can't claim for them when they become apparent.
  • I agree you would not know this, my house is 75 years old and there is no way I can tell if there is a latent defect waiting to show itself next week. The issue is that the policy clearly states that it does not cover building defects, so would that not give Aviva a legitimate reason not to pay out?

    Different polices provide varying levels of cover, and if I don't take out a policy that covers hidden defects then surely I can't claim for them when they become apparent.

    Just checked my own policy which also has this exclusion, as do a couple of others I've looked at. Seems a bit unfair for those of us in older homes, where this must be a very rare occurrence but one that could have extremely serious consequences.
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 November 2015 at 7:19PM
    Trying not to give advice as I'm not a building expert, just someone who's bought a few older properties over the years, and helped my kids to do the same.
    It would be helpful to see the exact wording of the written report from the builder, is there is a difference between insufficient ties and ties that have corroded( a common issue apparently ) as one 'seems ' to imply poor workmanship and the other simple wear ie metal rusts.get them to email you a copy ASAP . That report should also indicate if there were any outward signs that should have been spotted , eg cracks, sagging or bowing of walls.

    And as for the mortar, again is that poor workmanship, or simply the the type of mortar in common use?p at that time?
    There's a possibility that there is more danger to pedestrians in this situation from falling masonry, particularly with these high winds, has this been addressed?
  • Hi Kesaluner

    Thanks for your post and I'm so sorry to hear about the situation your Uncle has been put in related to his home insurance claim.

    If you'd like me to arrange for someone to contact either your Uncle or yourself on his behalf, so they can discuss his further options and answer any questions he has, please email the following details to social@aviva.co.uk -

    Your Uncle's full name
    Your Uncle's date of birth
    Your Uncle's postcode
    Policy number
    Your full name
    Whether you have permission to discuss the details on his behalf
    Your Money Saving Expert username

    I hope this helps and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

    Kind Regards

    Stephanie

    Aviva Social Media Team
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.