We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Non refundable hotel booking
NJP2810
Posts: 2 Newbie
Booked a non refundable hotel in London and chose not to go after the Paris attacks, the hotel said we could not get any money back but would keep the booking open for a couple of months, unfortunately with babysitters, Christmas and new year commitments we are unable to use it in the next couple of months.
I've heard rumours (in Scotland) you have to offer a percentage of the money back even though it was booked as non refundable?
I've heard rumours (in Scotland) you have to offer a percentage of the money back even though it was booked as non refundable?
0
Comments
-
That may or may not be true but as the room you booked was in England the rules {even for the same company COULD be different and we also know rumours can never be trusted.0
-
I haven't heard that rumour.Booked a non refundable hotel in London and chose not to go after the Paris attacks, the hotel said we could not get any money back but would keep the booking open for a couple of months, unfortunately with babysitters, Christmas and new year commitments we are unable to use it in the next couple of months.
I've heard rumours (in Scotland) you have to offer a percentage of the money back even though it was booked as non refundable?
Have a read of this post entitled Is a deposit ever refundable?:
It is my opinion that you chose the lower price whilst being aware of the terms, and as such no refund should be made.
I think the hotel are being generous in allowing you the flexibility of a later booking.0 -
Ironically, when you think of the Tunisia and Paris attacks (lets not delve into other worldwide terrorist attacks because frankly English people aren't TOO bothered about those) but it was probably much much safer to visit the countries shortly after this.
Terrorist attacks lead to a huge, and often temporary, increase in security not to mention elimination of the immediate threats (those who blew themselves up in Paris). The fact that the others have been hunted down relentlessly also serves as a point. Suffice to say that it was *probably* the safest time for you to visit London (which is already much better defended than Paris for a number of reasons).
That's just a logical point about your reason for cancelling, but you did and the legal aspect needs exploring.
Suffice to say that you have cost the hotel some money by cancelling. You should be liable for those losses. What they amount to is up for debate, so you can certainly query this with the hotel.
On a 'bottom line' level I'm astounded that you've ended up in this situation, but I suppose I can appreciate the apprehension based on the Paris attacks (even though they are highly unlikely to be accurate).0 -
How much are we talking about?“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”
― Groucho Marx0 -
Why, what difference does that make?pendragon_arther wrote: »How much are we talking about?0 -
Ironically, when you think of the Tunisia and Paris attacks (lets not delve into other worldwide terrorist attacks because frankly English people aren't TOO bothered about those) but it was probably much much safer to visit the countries shortly after this.
Terrorist attacks lead to a huge, and often temporary, increase in security not to mention elimination of the immediate threats (those who blew themselves up in Paris). The fact that the others have been hunted down relentlessly also serves as a point. Suffice to say that it was *probably* the safest time for you to visit London (which is already much better defended than Paris for a number of reasons).
That's just a logical point about your reason for cancelling, but you did and the legal aspect needs exploring.
Suffice to say that you have cost the hotel some money by cancelling. You should be liable for those losses. What they amount to is up for debate, so you can certainly query this with the hotel.
On a 'bottom line' level I'm astounded that you've ended up in this situation, but I suppose I can appreciate the apprehension based on the Paris attacks (even though they are highly unlikely to be accurate).
But only if they weren't/aren't able to rebook the room.0 -
No.
The OP should be liable for those losses whether or not the room is re-let.
Daytona0 was talking about extra costs incurred as a direct result of the OP's cancellation.0 -
-
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »How about any admin costs involved in taking the first booking then arranging for the refund to be paid out?
That implies the hotel would recruit someone especially to do this refund. The reality is it will be processed within five minutes by a member of staff they would be employing anyway so no additional costs
Admin costs to cover general business processes by already employed staff are frankly a bit of a scam.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards