We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Could my 3y.o. daughter own 5% of a house in my trust under 18?

245

Comments

  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    If the OP has a second charge on the property wouldn't that make the 5% a loan rather than a gift and would a mortgage lender accept that money as part of the deposit?
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Pixie5740 wrote: »
    If the OP has a second charge on the property wouldn't that make the 5% a loan rather than a gift and would a mortgage lender accept that money as part of the deposit?
    It would be acceptable to some lenders and not others, hence;-

    "a few mortgage lenders won't have a problem with it from the ex's POV"

    as it's her mortgage lender we're talking about here.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Thanks everybody for the flurry of responses.

    I am not familiar with the second charge concept :?
    By googling, it seems to direct me towards second charge mortgage but I cannot seem to find relevant information about an individual providing a "second charge" to another individual.

    Would that be equivalent of the 5% of the house value and therefore, should the house was sold, the 5% would be worth 5% of the sale price?

    Would such "Second Charge" be arranged through a solicitor?

    J.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Her lender will have a first charge (mortgage) over the property to secure the home loan.

    You have a charge over the property for your 5%. This means when she remortgages or sells, you get your 5% back before she would able to realise any proceeds.

    The only potential issue is if she defaults on the first charge. The lender would get its money back and if there was nothing left, you would get nothing. Your second charge ranks behind the lender's first charge.

    You would have the charge drawn up by a solicitor. She would need the approval of her mortgage lender as I mentioned and no, I have no idea what a solicitor you might want to use might charge...
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    ? Voluntary payments are completely recognised by the CMS


    this is a loan, which wouldn't be recognised for that reason.

    As what?

    Exactly as it says on the tin, voluntary and therefore exempt from any potential assessment.

    The OP is potentially exposing themselves to a lot of risk. That was my point.
  • chappers
    chappers Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    What is your overriding concern here is it that you want to leave something for your daughter in the event something should happen to you or is it just that whilst putting up the money for the house you would rather not be involved, so as to access the RTB scheme.

    If the former then surely a will is the easiest way to do that and if the latter then lend the money to your ex, but take a charge on the property, then you won't be involved in the mortgage and free to pursue your own mortgage via RTB.
    Incidentally your charge on the property would usually be for the fixed amount of the loan as per a mortgage, not sure if your charge could be for an equity stake, but I'm sure someone else could clarify that. Maybe if that is necessary some other form of legal document could be drawn up.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    marksoton wrote: »
    As what?

    Exactly as it says on the tin, voluntary and therefore exempt from any potential assessment.

    The OP is potentially exposing themselves to a lot of risk. That was my point.

    Not at all.

    Most cases these days are on a voluntary basis!

    The CMS doesn't even get involved if the NRP is making 'voluntary' payments.
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    Not at all.

    Most cases these days are on a voluntary basis!

    The CMS doesn't even get involved if the NRP is making 'voluntary' payments.

    Indeed. I think we are at cross purposes here. I was referring to previous CSA rules where any voluntary payment was not considered as maintenance. Apologies.

    I'm still perplexed as to why the OP sees fit to help buy his ex a home.

    Madness.
  • chappers
    chappers Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    marksoton wrote: »
    I'm still perplexed as to why the OP sees fit to help buy his ex a home.

    Madness.

    Maybe in your eyes, there could be a myriad of reasons most likely being that his daughter has a decent secure place to live and more importantly it's not any of our business
  • To be honest, I have no idea :( I am just trying to be nice for my daughter, albeit everything that happened. :( I guess I am concerned to end up going all the way with a solicitor/court as I cannot afford but to an extent, nor can she.
    However, the more I think about the fact that she opened a CMS case against me despite the monthly payment, the more I think I should stick to the legal approach and if she wants part of my deposit to be in trust, then she should take me to court.

    I am really struggling with deciding what is right or wrong and what I should be doing next :(
    J.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.