We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Petition to government to change parking law

Joakland
Posts: 2 Newbie
Amend Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to restrict charges for overstaying Parking
Being charged £100 for overstaying at a private carpark is unfair.
Following the supreme court case Bevis vs ParkingEye, Parliament need to make an amendment to add a section to Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, to restrict charges for overstaying to a much smaller sum (say £10)
In light of the recent ruling there has to be an acceptable limit on charges for overstaying. £100 for staying as little as 5mins over a free or £1 parking space is TOO MUCH.
Motorists unite. This is the last way to stop companies like ParkingEye charging whatever they want. Why should they limit it to £100 after this court hearing? Sign up so we get heard.
Please see petition on
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/111763
to get a cap on Parking Charges!
Being charged £100 for overstaying at a private carpark is unfair.
Following the supreme court case Bevis vs ParkingEye, Parliament need to make an amendment to add a section to Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, to restrict charges for overstaying to a much smaller sum (say £10)
In light of the recent ruling there has to be an acceptable limit on charges for overstaying. £100 for staying as little as 5mins over a free or £1 parking space is TOO MUCH.
Motorists unite. This is the last way to stop companies like ParkingEye charging whatever they want. Why should they limit it to £100 after this court hearing? Sign up so we get heard.
Please see petition on
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/111763
to get a cap on Parking Charges!
0
Comments
-
Signed and shared via FB.Never Knowingly Understood.
Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)
3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)0 -
Signed.
I'd have gone further, and called for a ban on private parking companies using ANPR for parking enforcement, unless it was to facilitate a barrier-operated pay-on-exit system.
This would force them to properly manage their car parks*
*but then they would not make as much money......Bournemouth - home of the Mighty Cherries0 -
'People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool.' Wizard's first rule © Terry Goodkind.0
-
the day that MPs don,t play golf with the "Renshaw-smiths" of this world , something might change , until then ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0
-
Signed and shared.0
-
enfield_freddy wrote: »the day that MPs don,t play golf with the "Renshaw-smiths" of this world , something might change , until then ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
the bevis !!!! messed up. a lot of people were telling him not to take this on because he would lose against a trained barrister and have ramifications with all consumer law.
And it has, now penuitive measures in b2c could be put into all contracts, with companies citing bevis vs parkineye as an example wereby they can impose admin costs in order to deter breach/change in contract.
the mse idiots couldn't sit still with the idea of bevis going to court. now you saw the outcome. this gives strength to parking eye.
mps wont vote for this, these parking invoices are expense claims for them.0 -
p.s. the petition is dumb. you should remove the £10 suggestion. its too low and people will never pay for parking and will just pay the fine wen they get caught. £10 is less than the cost of all day parking in a lot of places. the council street parking charges £4 an hour.
if i had to shop in london, and might need to park for 1.5 hours, do i pay £6 or just risk it and not pay and possibly get £10 pcn... im risking it all the way.
just keep it just low or in line with what local authorities charge,0 -
Parking is a privilege, not a right.
If you are unable to follow a few simple rules in accordance with that privilege then don't park there. It's as simple as that.
My reform to the parking laws would be as follows -
First offence: A couple of heavies would come round armed with baseball bats and take out most of the glassware (windows, lights etc.).
Second offence: Car would be crushed.
Third offence: Car would be crushed with you in it.0 -
Parking is a privilege, not a right.
If you are unable to follow a few simple rules in accordance with that privilege then don't park there. It's as simple as that.
My reform to the parking laws would be as follows -
First offence: A couple of heavies would come round armed with baseball bats and take out most of the glassware (windows, lights etc.).
Second offence: Car would be crushed.
Third offence: Car would be crushed with you in it.
Actually I entirely agree with the line even though I suspect that I would be lumped together by London Tiger with those he calls "the MSE idiots" because I assist those who are properly described as victims of the PPC skimdustry.
Were you to listen to some of the siren voices in this thread who appear to relish the fact that Barry Beavis lost his case, if only on a I-told-you-so basis, one would think that Barry - and many of the others who come here seeking genuine help - were free-loaders and chancers when nothing could be further from the truth. It is a shame that those same siren voices betray their ignorance both of the facts of Barry's case, the truth behind the vast majority of threads that appear here everyday and the potential impact of the judgment for everyone. As for recommending violence from someone whose username would suggest they had at least some buddhist knowledge need I say more than "karma"?My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards