IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
MSE News: Parking campaigner fails to challenge 'excessive' charge at Supreme Court

Former_MSE_Helen
Posts: 2,382 Forumite
A motorist who mounted legal proceedings against a private parking firm has lost the case at The Supreme Court...
Read the full story:
Parking campaigner fails to challenge 'excessive' fine at Supreme Court

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
Parking campaigner fails to challenge 'excessive' fine at Supreme Court

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
Comments
-
At least MSE are on the ball (time-wise) this time ... usually they are at least a week late with their articles.0
-
Best be careful.
MSE might impose a maximum post length or maximum number of posts daily and charge £10 for going over those limits.
A restaurateur might charge you for dirtying his napkins or spilling food on his carpet, drinking from the wrong side of a wine glass or arriving a couple of minutes late for a booking.
Supermarkets could impose extra charges for pushing a trolley the wrong way up/down an aisle, going over trolley use time limits or loading beyond the load line.
Bus and coach operators might charge for failing to sit within seat lines or wiping the windows of condensation.
It seems that provided there is some overriding principle in play and the charge is a deterrent against doing other than that principle then that's good enough - provided there was a warning sign.
This is what this judgment allows for.My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
The Law on Penalties After ParkingEye v Beavis : Articles : Insights : Hardwicke
Author: John de Waal QC - Barry's QCFree/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed0 -
To avoid junk mail I am going to start sending invoices for £100 to anyone who sends me unsolicited material.
I'll make sure I put the sign somewhere which makes it pretty much unreadable.
The supreme court says these charges are ok.0 -
rididculus just watching now-the charge the judge said wasnt unreasonable
not looking good for my invoice!What goes around-comes around0 -
Lord Toulson was the only one who saw it for what it really is.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »Lord Toulson was the only one who saw it for what it really is.PPCs say its carpark management, BPA say its raising standards..... we all know its just about raking in the revenue. :eek:0
-
I shall place this notice inside my car windscreen.
Contractual parking offers:
Any offered contractual parking charge notices shall be subject to a contract formation fee of £150, if you do not agree to this contractual offer, do not send a parking charge notice to the keeper of this vehicle.
This is a Contractual offer to accept the contractual formulation charge.
As I read the judgement of the Judges, this is good enough to constitute a contract, its a sign and they have ample opportunity to read and accept the offer.
Lets not get over carried away here, they can have it one way or the other and what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Get your contractual offers printed and displayed in your cars, its open season !I do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
Now that would make for an interesting court case.... I dare someone to try it! Anything to match the PPCs in the sh*t-housery stakes...
It wouldn't work, surely... much as I would like it to! Especially with ANPR operated car parks. How could they enter into a contract?Bournemouth - home of the Mighty Cherries0 -
Now that would make for an interesting court case.... I dare someone to try it! Anything to match the PPCs in the sh*t-housery stakes...
It wouldn't work, surely... much as I would like it to! Especially with ANPR operated car parks. How could they enter into a contract?
You have afforded them every available opportunity to read the contract, which according to the judges is more than good enough to form a contract.
Lets be honest, it is not a bad thing they won.
Now they will overcook the goose once and for all and MP's are going to be forced to act like they did clampers.
Let us not forget, many Judges supported Clampers in court cases as well.I do Contracts, all day every day.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.3K Spending & Discounts
- 240.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 253.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards