London Capital and Finance

Catrina777

Here is the introductory piece I have contacted the SFO had an interview with CID, contacted HRMC, also Kent Police.

I have clear evidence of what is going on, which I offered to show conclusive evidence, but no one actually seems to believe me or care, or they just can't get their head round this or maybe just too much paper work!

I have just contacted the Financial Times also the FCA with a positive response .

In the mean time If your read the letter I sent to Finbarr O'Connell , it explains everything.

Then if you use the Companies House website, which is in the public domain you will be able to track all the information & see for yourself the scale of corruption. ie the Global Security Trustees & the connection to London Power Management Limited, pay particular attention to the change of directors, company names etc, also the signatory names of Buss Murton Law Owner Robert Sedgwick who was suspended & partner Alex Lee PARASITES!! They were supposed to be looking after the security of the company on our behalf as a separate entity I can't see how the Administrators could have overlooked this! I say no more look at the evidence & draw your own conclusions.

I hope those funds will be tracked down & government departments listen & learn lessons from this fiasco.

All the best to the1,1600 !

Ian.

londoninvestor

masonic wrote: »

This might be a logical next step for the two of four individuals who have not repaid bondholder money that was "resting" in their personal bank accounts.

Craggy Island Capital and Finance?

Botheredin

londoninvestor wrote: »

Craggy Island Capital and Finance?

Have they actually repaid the funds now then?

masonic

Botheredin wrote: »

Have they actually repaid the funds now then?

Two out of four have, which is two more than I'd anticipated. We haven't heard from the other two, perhaps they haven't got back from their trip to Las Vegas.

Botheredin

masonic wrote: »

Two out of four have, which is two more than I'd anticipated. We haven't heard from the other two, perhaps they haven't got back from their trip to Las Vegas.

Perhaps an attempt to avoid jail time... on both scenarios?

Which also begs the question why it was in their accounts and if it was a legitimate business then why pay it back if their creditors defaulted etc etc etc

masonic

Botheredin wrote: »

Perhaps an attempt to avoid jail time... on both scenarios?

Which also begs the question why it was in their accounts and if it was a legitimate business then why pay it back if their creditors defaulted etc etc etc

Perhaps it was placed there so that they were able to make the gesture of repaying it to demonstrate they were fully cooperating and had no nefarious intent. That coupled with a plausible reason for holding the cash might be enough to sway opinion.

Botheredin

masonic wrote: »

Perhaps it was placed there so that they were able to make the gesture of repaying it to demonstrate they were fully cooperating and had no nefarious intent. That coupled with a plausible reason for holding the cash might be enough to sway opinion.

I still believe in Father Christmas and the Tooth Fairy also...

masonic

Botheredin wrote: »

I still believe in Father Christmas and the Tooth Fairy also...

Unfortunately it isn't your beliefs that will matter in this case... and the outcome is likely to hinge on what can be proven rather than what is suspected, but the less suspected the better as far as these individuals are concerned.

Botheredin

masonic wrote: »

Unfortunately it isn't your beliefs that will matter in this case... and the outcome is likely to hinge on what can be proven rather than what is suspected.

Understood. Was a tongue in cheek comment but I do take your point.

masonic

Botheredin wrote: »

Understood. Was a tongue in cheek comment but I do take your point.

As an aside, it's interesting to observe that it's been a while since the 25% creamed off by Surge Financial was mentioned. All this talk of others helping themselves to cash and the massive red-herring of Global Security Trustees Limited is rather distracting, isn't it?