Moldy Food Product

marliepanda

firefox1956 wrote: »

What on earth is 'diarhea' ??????

My phones autocorrect/spelling/typing makes me vulnerable. How rude.

marliepanda

BlueEyedGirl wrote: »

No, but their previous posts on MSE does.

Just because someone is disabled does not mean they are vulnerable, especially in relation to a tomato ketchup bottle.

This person is clearly capable of communicating all of their issues effectively. I would not class them as vulnerable just because they have a disability. I would think many disabled people would not like to be labelled 'vulnerable' for no reason other than their disability.

whitegoods_engineer

BlueEyedGirl wrote: »

I love it when MSE users take the mick out of vulnerable people... :mad:

Nothing stated in these posts show a 'vulnerable' person. If as you later state that the person is 'vulnerable' because of the person's previous posts, you assume we all check all previous posts for every person before replying.

I believe from an earlier reply that the op may be disabled. Disability doesn't necessarily equate to vulnerability. Have you taken it upon yourself to 'nanny' on behalf of any disabled people on here then?

System

Sounds like the PC brigade's 'outraged on behalf of' syndrome without actually having any sort of discussion with the people that they are outraged on behalf of

POPPYOSCAR

The name of the OP says it all.

pulliptears

BlueEyedGirl wrote: »

No, but their previous posts on MSE does.

If you seriously expect someone to read an OP's entire past posting history to ascertain their mental state before replying to a thread you are deluded.

Fosterdog

pulliptears wrote: »

If you seriously expect someone to read an OP's entire past posting history to ascertain their mental state before replying to a thread you are deluded.

Be careful what you say in case being delusional is classed as a vulnerability

whitegoods_engineer

Is that the same as fingers in ears "la la la, I'm not listening?"

ThumbRemote

pulliptears wrote: »

If you seriously expect someone to read an OP's entire past posting history to ascertain their mental state before replying to a thread you are deluded.

How about posters just try not acting like jerks? Maybe only replying to a post if they had something useful to contribute, rather than taking any opportunity to criticise or belittle someone else.

Esqui

I note that their first question was

There anyway I can complain about this and get some compensation?

Vulnerable or not, that's a red flag.