We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Camera Advice please!

Options
After searching the internet for the last few days I have decided to buy the Panasonic DMC-FX07 as seen here and was wondering what you guys thought of it please?

I am really looking for a camera that will take good quality pics with an image stabiliser and pretty small.

I am going on hols next month and want to buy a camera that will take high quality pics but not too expensive @ £150 or less?

My friend has one of the more expensive Panasonic cameras and the quality from that is absolutely superb.

Will the above do the job or can you suggest something else?

Thanks:money:
"He's a maniac, maniac that's for sure,
He will kill your cat and nail him to the door" :eek:
Murphys No More Pies Club Member #95
«13

Comments

  • Blowsy
    Blowsy Posts: 76 Forumite
    The only thing I'll say on this (so you don't make the same mistake I did with my first digi camera) is:

    Decide on what's more important: Size or Picture quality because the general rule of thumb is that you'd can't have both.

    I bought a smallish camera first time around with decent (at the time) picture quality/specs but quickly realised that I never wanted to take it out with my because it was too bulky in my pockets.

    I've since bought a Casio Exilim which is very thin and the quality of the picture are good enough for day-to-day use and I take it everywhere and end up using it alot more.

    The model you've posted looks like a neat size.
  • moonrakerz
    moonrakerz Posts: 8,650 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If you are using it for family/holiday 'snaps' don't waste money on anything over 6 megapixels.
    I won't bore you with the maths (Google it if you want !), but you won't notice any difference in the picture quality between a 6 and 12 megapixel camera.

    All I would say is buy something with a known name.
  • maniac886
    maniac886 Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    moonrakerz wrote: »
    If you are using it for family/holiday 'snaps' don't waste money on anything over 6 megapixels.
    I won't bore you with the maths (Google it if you want !), but you won't notice any difference in the picture quality between a 6 and 12 megapixel camera.

    All I would say is buy something with a known name.


    Would you consider the Panasonic to be good enough?
    "He's a maniac, maniac that's for sure,
    He will kill your cat and nail him to the door" :eek:
    Murphys No More Pies Club Member #95
  • espresso
    espresso Posts: 16,448 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    maniac886 wrote: »
    Would you consider the Panasonic to be good enough?

    Depends on your requirements. The Panasonic has more of a wide angle lens i.e. The 3.6x optical zoom lens has a focal length equivalent to 28-102mm in 35mm format, compared to the more standard three times optical zoom lens which has a focal length equivalent to 38 - 114mm in 35mm format i.e. can zoom in closer.
    :doh: Blue text on this forum usually signifies hyperlinks, so click on them!..:wall:
  • maniac886
    maniac886 Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    I don't think I will be zooming in that much.

    The pics will be of buildings/monuments and other stuff.
    "He's a maniac, maniac that's for sure,
    He will kill your cat and nail him to the door" :eek:
    Murphys No More Pies Club Member #95
  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Don't go too wide with buildings unless you can keep the camera level - pointing a wide-angle lens up or down gives you "bendy wall syndrome" (try a few practice shots before the hols).
  • maniac886
    maniac886 Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    ManAtHome wrote: »
    Don't go too wide with buildings unless you can keep the camera level - pointing a wide-angle lens up or down gives you "bendy wall syndrome" (try a few practice shots before the hols).

    Ah right...is the camera no good for taking pics of buildings??:confused:
    "He's a maniac, maniac that's for sure,
    He will kill your cat and nail him to the door" :eek:
    Murphys No More Pies Club Member #95
  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Most cameras are ok for buildings, it's just that you get a very different picture using the telephoto end and standing back than you do getting close up and using the wide end.

    Give it a try on your house (or any other building) - start over the road/bottom of the garden, then move closer adjusting the zoom to keep the building around the same size, then load into the pooter and compare.

    That's the great thing about digital, you can experiment for nothing.
  • judderman62
    judderman62 Posts: 5,134 Forumite
    maniac886 wrote: »
    Would you consider the Panasonic to be good enough?

    only you can answer that really - we all have different ideas of what's OK- I am an absolute stickler for quality and find the quality from digital cameras rather disappointing.

    I now have a Canon D400 and the quality is good but a lot of images I have seen from digicams have left me distinctly underwhelmed :(:(

    The image stabilisation is certainly a handy thing to have and from memory Panasonics use Zeiss lenses - welll glass doesn't get any better than Zeiss.

    If your standards aren't too critical you will probably be happy with it (can you not maybe trial one at a local dealer then look at the results ?)

    If you are fussy like me then you probably need to look at an SLR - they also use considerably larger sensors- this has a significant impact on quality.

    take a peek at steves digicams (google for it) - it's a good place for reviews

    good luck and hope you find something you will be happy with

    judders
    Hate and I do mean Hate my apple Mac Computer - wish I'd never bought the thing
    Do little and often
    Please stop using the word "of" when you actually mean "have" - it's damned annoying :mad:
  • judderman62
    judderman62 Posts: 5,134 Forumite
    Here's the link to Steve's Digicams
    Hate and I do mean Hate my apple Mac Computer - wish I'd never bought the thing
    Do little and often
    Please stop using the word "of" when you actually mean "have" - it's damned annoying :mad:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.