We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Speeding - by being followed

135

Comments

  • Edwood_Woodwood
    Edwood_Woodwood Posts: 2,500 Forumite
    edited 20 September 2015 at 11:12AM
    EddieKidd wrote: »
    Not good advice based on a random claim it once worked.

    Anything with a 100% success rate I consider worthwhile.

    Even if it failed a next time, it would still be a 50/50 success rate.

    Better odds than 0%, which is what admitting to it is.

    In any case, it was slightly different to the OP in that I wasn't certain of my speed.

    Why would I admit to something I cannot confirm?
  • Why would I admit to something I cannot confirm?


    More importantly, why do you think that you have the right to drive whilst admitting that you are not aware enough to know the speed you are driving at?
  • Minrich
    Minrich Posts: 635 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 20 September 2015 at 11:45AM
    More importantly, why do you think that you have the right to drive whilst admitting that you are not aware enough to know the speed you are driving at?

    The right to drive ? Why is speed relevant ? Most people don't know what speed they are doing , but can guess . Most of us can tell whether we are doing 30 or 70 . What is relevant is that they were driving well enough to not attract any other form of criticism from the Police apart from their speed. Too many people think that speed per se is a big issue when its not really . Concentration awareness and positioning are alot more relevant 99.9% of the time.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,952 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Anything with a 100% success rate I consider worthwhile.

    Even if it failed a next time, it would still be a 50/50 success rate.

    Better odds than 0%, which is what admitting to it is.

    In any case, it was slightly different to the OP in that I wasn't certain of my speed.

    Why would I admit to something I cannot confirm?

    There's no need either to confirm or deny.

    The problem with denial is that it may limit your options. Best to say nothing and decide later on your course of action.
  • Minrich wrote: »
    Too many people think that speed per se is a big issue when its not really . Concentration awareness and positioning are alot more relevant 99.9% of the time.


    Maybe speed in itself isn't a major issue, but surely if you are not aware of what speed you are doing, you can't really know what sort of distance you would be able to stop in an emergency if required.
    Also, with the proliferation of speed cameras in the UK (cameras that unlike some police officers offer no discretion when it comes to whether or not the speeding offence is followed up), surely being aware of your speed is fairly important if you wish to keep a clean licence.
  • Retrogamer
    Retrogamer Posts: 4,218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'd put it down to experience, accept the consequences and move on.

    £100 fine and 3 points / speed awareness course is much nicer than higher fine and more points if you plead not guilty and go to court.

    I'm on Pepipoo a lot and i can't see any defence you'd have if you were to plead not guilty.
    All your base are belong to us.
  • taxiphil
    taxiphil Posts: 1,980 Forumite
    edited 21 September 2015 at 4:33AM
    matttye wrote: »
    If you weren't speeding, I would still consider pleading guilty because you're likely to be convicted.
    If you goto court and lose which is highly likely it will cost you much more.

    Wow. Astonishing. Some people are blissfully happy to surrender their presumption of innocence and right to a fair trial.
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    It's more about picking your battles ... this is one which the motorist is highly unlikely to win, especially as the offence was corroborated by two officers.
  • Edwood_Woodwood
    Edwood_Woodwood Posts: 2,500 Forumite
    edited 21 September 2015 at 10:19PM
    More importantly, why do you think that you have the right to drive whilst admitting that you are not aware enough to know the speed you are driving at?

    If a cop said to me I was driving at 47mph then that is a very precise speed.

    Unless I kept my eyes constantly on the speedo then I wouldn't know my absolute accurate speed, it still wouldn't be precise in any case.


    I'd rather keep my eyes on the road and mirrors and the odd glance at my speed.

    You keep your vision on the speedo.

    I know who's the safer.
  • taxiphil wrote: »
    Wow. Astonishing. Some people are blissfully happy to surrender their presumption of innocence and right to a fair trial.

    Too true.

    If I was certain I was driving at 47mph then fine, however, if I am not, then why on earth would I agree I was?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.