We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Buying an underpinned house - who guarantee's it?

mickburkejnr
Posts: 66 Forumite
We've placed an offer on a house that's perfect really, and when we made the offer we were then told the house was underpinned in 2012 and we were provided with a solicitors letter, certificate of the work, and the schedule or work done.
I've read through the documents, and it's made out to the people who owned the property before the people we're buying from were there. I've called the solicitor regarding this, and they said they were notified that there would be a change in tennant at which point they said this would have to be confirmed on purchase of the house, and this never happened. They have told me that the owners of the house who had the work done need to contact them and inform them that the house was actually sold, and then the certificate can be transferred to us when (more like if now) buy the house. It also transpires that it was the executors of the estate were the ones who had the work done.
So I have a few thoughts in my head about this work:
1) If the certificate wasn't in the current tennants name could they have still insured the house and the work that had been carried out?
2) Who actually guarentees the work? The insurer who initially did the work, the contractors, or the house insurance of the tennant?
3) If it turns out that the current tennants didn't carry on the insurance of the people who did the work, or because of the certificate in the wrong name, does this mean we're going to be absolutely screwed if something goes wrong in the future?
Personally, I like the fact the work has been done, and the cost of insurance doesn't worry me as I'm used to paying stupid money for car insurance. But what worries me is if the house can't be insured at all, or if the underpinning goes wrong in the future that we'll be truly stuck with a house we can't afford to fix or sell.
I've read through the documents, and it's made out to the people who owned the property before the people we're buying from were there. I've called the solicitor regarding this, and they said they were notified that there would be a change in tennant at which point they said this would have to be confirmed on purchase of the house, and this never happened. They have told me that the owners of the house who had the work done need to contact them and inform them that the house was actually sold, and then the certificate can be transferred to us when (more like if now) buy the house. It also transpires that it was the executors of the estate were the ones who had the work done.
So I have a few thoughts in my head about this work:
1) If the certificate wasn't in the current tennants name could they have still insured the house and the work that had been carried out?
2) Who actually guarentees the work? The insurer who initially did the work, the contractors, or the house insurance of the tennant?
3) If it turns out that the current tennants didn't carry on the insurance of the people who did the work, or because of the certificate in the wrong name, does this mean we're going to be absolutely screwed if something goes wrong in the future?
Personally, I like the fact the work has been done, and the cost of insurance doesn't worry me as I'm used to paying stupid money for car insurance. But what worries me is if the house can't be insured at all, or if the underpinning goes wrong in the future that we'll be truly stuck with a house we can't afford to fix or sell.
1
Comments
-
You're confusing a few things. These comments might help:
- A contractor underpins a house. They guarantee their work (maybe for 12 or 20 or 25 years).
- If a problem with the contractor's workmanship or materials shows up during the guarantee period, the contractors come back and fix it.
- But just in case the contractor goes bust (before the guarantee finishes), the contractor can take out an insurance policy. It is then an 'insurance backed gurantee'.
So the contractor's insurance company will payout if the contractor's workmanship/materials were bad, and the contractor has gone bust.
- The 'insurance backed guarantee' is nothing to do with home insurance. (Home insurance policies don't cover bad workmanship/materials.)
- It should be possible to transfer the guarantee to each new owner of the house
- Now, regarding home insurance, if may be easiest to continue insuring with whoever the current home insurer is.
(- if you did want to use a different home insurer, you would have to go to a specialist insurer and tell them about the underpinning. And they may ask you if the contractor provided an 'insurance backed guarantee')1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards