We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Agent wants to " substantiate" our offer before he puts it to vendor?
Options
Comments
-
Wrong!!!!
Of course the vendor will still have to pay the EA their commission as they 'introduced' the buyer0 -
The 1979 EA Act places an obligation on agents to qualify purchasers. Sadly, it did not prescribe how this should be done.
You can't point to the Act to insist your offer be put forward, then try to deny the EA the right to fulfill its legal obligation under the same piece of legislation.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Cheeky_Monkey wrote: »Wrong!!!!
Of course the vendor will still have to pay the EA their commission as they 'introduced' the buyer
Not if the EA refused to meet their legal obligation in passing on the offer. I am fairly sure this would void the contract (and leave the EA open to further legal action).0 -
kingstreet wrote: »The 1979 EA Act places an obligation on agents to qualify purchasers. Sadly, it did not prescribe how this should be done.
You can't point to the Act to insist your offer be put forward, then try to deny the EA the right to fulfill its legal obligation under the same piece of legislation.
If the act does not prescribe how this be done then the EA can't put a particular method of doing it above the clear legal obligation to pass on an offer, so yes you can. I would have thought.
Does it specify they must qualify purchasers before passing on any offers?0 -
The agent is obviously on fairly sticky ground, and in clear break of the 1979 act, in refusing to pass on an offer until a conversation with their in-house broker has taken place, however, I don't think a prospective buyer should be too surprised to be asked for some evidence of their financial capability.0
-
ScorpiondeRooftrouser wrote: »If the act does not prescribe how this be done then the EA can't put a particular method of doing it above the clear legal obligation to pass on an offer, so yes you can. I would have thought.
Does it specify they must qualify purchasers before passing on any offers?
I don't recall any set order being set out either, but it would seem somewhat odd to insist an offer be submitted to vendor without it first being qualified.
TBH the EA Act is now over thirty-five years old and is showing its age. It certainly can't have intended to permit the growth of EA financial services by allowing the kind of coercion of purchaser which is regularly reported on here.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
It's just a way of trying to get you to use their broker. Don't do it - they won't refuse to pass on your offer if you stand firm.0
-
kingstreet wrote: »The problem is that as there is no firm direction as to how financial qualification should take place, it leaves agents with a lot of "latitude" in which they can operate.
I don't recall any set order being set out either, but it would seem somewhat odd to insist an offer be submitted to vendor without it first being qualified.
TBH the EA Act is now over thirty-five years old and is showing its age. It certainly can't have intended to permit the growth of EA financial services by allowing the kind of coercion of purchaser which is regularly reported on here.
I don't think it's odd at all to say "They have offered x, are you interested" and then check the finances once the offer is accepted. In fact I think it is very odd not to tell the vendor you have an offer if someone refuses to be checked; I haven't bought a house in 8 years but never have I been asked to prove anything before an offer has been accepted. It has to be the vendor's decision how to proceed in any rational world.
By your interpretation EAs could refuse to pass on any offer unless the buyer comes in with a suitcase full of cash and justify themselves by saying "That's the way we do things."0 -
It's just a way of trying to get you to use their broker. Don't do it - they won't refuse to pass on your offer if you stand firm.
Doesn't matter if they do if the vendor lives in the house. Just knock on the door or drop a note through it. I would tell the EA immediately they suggested not passing on my offer that I was going to do this at my first available opportunity; their reaction would be interesting.0 -
ScorpiondeRooftrouser wrote: »I don't think it's odd at all to say "They have offered x, are you interested" and then check the finances once the offer is accepted. In fact I think it is very odd not to tell the vendor you have an offer if someone refuses to be checked; I haven't bought a house in 8 years but never have I been asked to prove anything before an offer has been accepted. It has to be the vendor's decision how to proceed in any rational world.
By your interpretation EAs could refuse to pass on any offer unless the buyer comes in with a suitcase full of cash and justify themselves by saying "That's the way we do things."
Qualification was a two minute phone call back then and my response to the negotiator would have been a yes or a no and not details of what I thought the potential purchaser could afford or be dragged up to...
As a vendor, if you got an acceptable offer then three days later your EA had to come back and tell you it was a non-starter for financial reasons, wouldn't you ask why they didn't check that in the first place?
I would.
I don't like what goes on, particularly amongst the national chain estate agents who seem to think every sale is their god-given opportunity to flog every over-priced crappy service they can shove down throat of buyer and seller.
The EA Act requires replacement.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards