We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DAC Beachcroft motoring claim
Comments
-
Solicitors (or anyone else for that matter) cannot go around taking out court claims in the name of a third party without getting their consent (obviously!)Then why are they asking for consent?
Were they to simply proceed and take out the claim in the OP's name they could expect their client to be pretty unhappy should it end up being thrown out when the "claimant" (the OP) failed to participate!
As posted above if the OP refuses to assist then he will be getting the bill instead!0 -
Thanks for replies everyone.
I'm not with the same insurer anymore as I switched last year.
They are not just seeking my consent, instead asking me to sign the county court claim issued in my name against my ex-neighbor. If for any reason the other party refuses to accept the liability (with all added costs), I have to appear in court, which doesn't enthuse me the slightest.0 -
Surely the prospect of having to settle up with your old insurer (if you refuse to comply) enthuses you even less!......If for any reason the other party refuses to accept the liability (with all added costs), I have to appear in court, which doesn't enthuse me the slightest.
(And if it wasn't for your old insurer's good service in not making you pay your excess or reducing your NCD till reimbursed (as they are entitled to do), then you probably would not be with a new insurer as your premiums would have reflected the (temporarily) lost NCD and the open claim on your record)0 -
No.
If the OP refuses to co-operate then their sights will be retrained.
On to him.
(As previously posted, it's a condition of the policy that the policyholder will assist the insurer recover his outlay)
Well shouldn't the insurer explain that when asking for consent? They can't expect us all to know exactly how they operate.0 -
They can expect us all to read the ts & cs especially after a claim! If the OP had done that then this would not come as a surprise!Well shouldn't the insurer explain that when asking for consent? They can't expect us all to know exactly how they operate.
(The insurer will explain all that in words that can be understood if the consent is not given!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards