CP Plus Help

ohmy6od2

I've sent the letter as above.

This is the reply I've had (Dated 17/09/15)

"We are not pursuing you as the registered keeper of the vehicle and, as such, the Protection of Freedoms Act does not apply in this case.

If you believe you have any relevant grounds for appeal, please forward these to us so that we may give them consideration.

We can confirm that we will hold the charge at the current rate of £100 for a further 14 days from the date of this correspondence"

ManxRed

Reply suggesting that they take the matter up with the driver.

ohmy6od2

So I just simply reply saying something along the lines of:

Dear CP Plus,

Thanks for your letter. As the driver is responsible for this fine, please take the matter up with them. No further communication will be entered in to by our company on this matter.

Regards,

Authorised office of XXXXXXX Limted

Umkomaas

Park_The_Ticket wrote: »

Please discontinue the practice of misusing the term 'fine'. As far as I have read, the police were not involved in this matter from the outset, so the term 'fine' is wholly inaccurate and misleading.

Police can't 'fine' anyone. Only the court can issue a fine.

Quentin

Umkomaas wrote: »

Police can't 'fine' anyone. Only the court can issue a fine.

Why do you say that? Takes us right off topic.

Police do issue on the spot fines


And others not associated with 'the court "

Fines for litter etc

Fines for parking.

Fines for no mot

Etc etc

ohmy6od2

If anyone could directly answer my question it would be appreciated.

Is this version better....?

Dear CP Plus,

Thanks for your letter. As the driver is responsible for this fake PCN, please take the matter up with them. No further communication will be entered in to by our company on this matter.

Regards,

Authorised officer of XXXXXXX Limted

fisherjim

ohmy6od2 wrote: »

If anyone could directly answer my question it would be appreciated.

Is this version better....?

Dear CP Plus,

Thanks for your letter. As the driver is responsible for this fake PCN, please take the matter up with them. No further communication will be entered in to by our company on this matter.

Regards,

Authorised officer of XXXXXXX Limted

As the driver is responsible for this charge, please take the matter up with them.

Is probably more businesslike.

ampersand

CP Plus.

To Whom It May Concern

Thank you for your letter of 17 September concerning your unenforceable invoice[ref.].

You must take this matter up with the driver. Only he or she can respond to an alleged parking event.

Further pursuit of this company by you will be seen as harassment and will remain on file as such.

Yours faithfully,

Authorised officer of XXXXXXX Limted

#
Y/f in business letters. Observe formalities and retain the upper hand in any paper trail.

Obtain another free CoP from the PO and attach it to your copy.

Coupon-mad

And state something like this to point the way ahead or you'll be playing email tennis with them for weeks:

Our previous contact was the appeal from the company as keeper - i.e. our appeal is that, in law, the company cannot be held liable and your charge is not based upon any loss. If you wish to hold keepers liable might I suggest you read paragraph 9 of Schedule 4 of the POFA 2012 and change your wording accordingly. However, in this particular instance it will be too late for you to send us a compliant notice and we will not be naming the driver.

Either accept or reject that appeal and send a POPLA code, or we will report your actions to the BPA.

ohmy6od2

Thanks for your replies. Will send the below unless any last minute changes are recommended.

22nd September 2015

CP Plus Limited
Appeals Department
PO Box 3573
Barnet
EN5 9QA


Re: Charge Notice XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Reg: XXXX XXX

To whom it may concern;

Thank you for your letter of 17 September 2015 concerning your unenforceable invoice ref
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

Our previous contact was the appeal from the company as the keeper - i.e. our appeal is that, in law, the company cannot be held liable and your charge is not based upon any loss. If you wish to hold keepers liable might I suggest you read paragraph 9 of Schedule 4 of the POFA 2012 and change your wording accordingly. However, in this particular instance it will be too late for you to send us a compliant notice and we will not be naming the driver.

Either accept or reject that appeal and send a POPLA code, or we will report your actions to the BPA.

Further pursuit of this company by you will be seen as harassment and will remain on file as such.


Yours faithfully,




Authorised officer of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX