We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CP Plus Help
Comments
-
salmosalaris wrote: »That'll do nicely
Just add that your company is the keeper of the vehicle . Don't want them returning to the hirer and it may be worth letting the hirer know that if they do to pass on any correspondence back to you .
PPC's love hire companies that just pay up and pass on the charge to their client
If I tell them that i'm the keeper, but then go on to say there's no keeper liability, am I not being contradictory? It's been a busy old day my heads a shed.0 -
There is no keeper liability because their NtK's are non compliant with schedule 4 . Therefore they can only pursue the driver .
By identifying your company as the keeper and not revealing who was driving they are royally f@@@ed
Keep all paperwork0 -
Send me a pm i'll deal with this off forum for you if someone will confirm my genuine intent0
-
Come on guys give the OP a nod to know I'm genuine0
-
Thanks, and I wasn't questioning your integrity. It just didn't look right when I read it back.
Your help has been very much appreciated.0 -
Letter now starts:
Re: Charge Notice XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Reg: XXXXXX
To whom it may concern;
We the company, as the keeper of the above mentioned vehicle wish to challenge the ‘Charge Notice’ on the following basis:
(The rest goes on as previously posted)0 -
No wait until someone confirms .
I've dealt with loads of this rubbish but you don't know that .
I only want to take this off forum because it has a slightly different angle that needs explaining
But the letter start is now fine0 -
Salmosolaris is one of the good guys here and is also a prolific poster on PePiPoo. Can be confidently contacted - a very knowledgable poster on all things private parking.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I genuinely can't thank you all enough. I'm off home, and will access again tomorrow.
I feel guilty that I've questioned anyone, but it was only so I was sure, not in any way to question their knowledge.
Catch up tomorrow. Thanks again0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards