📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Widescreen vs Fullscreen

Options
So, what are your opinions? I have recently sold my pesky 15" screen and am looking to buy a new screen... Now, would like to get an idea of whether it would be better to get a 20" fullscreen or a widescreen? And is 20" enough? My budget for the screen is about £150ish...

Thanks!
«1

Comments

  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    there is still a strong preference among buyers towards 4:3 computer screens, but i guess its up to you which suits your needs best.

    Again, size is a personal thing. Some people can find a 20 inch screen overbearing on a desk, others will settle for nothing less.
  • Mobeer
    Mobeer Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Academoney Grad Photogenic
    Most applications are still made with a 4:3 format screen in mind, so I would stick with 4:3, unless the monitor were very large. But that's just my opinion.
  • GoofyGAT
    GoofyGAT Posts: 1,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Go into a store like PCWorld/similar & check them out firsthand.

    There are many advantages (another article) of widescreen over the standard 4:3 - so widescreen for sure (OK, I'm a little biased!). Even the '4:3 applications' look & handle better in widescreen I reckon. And get the biggest reasonably good quality one you can afford for the money - they aren't overbearing unless 32" & above!

    I was using a 15" CRT a year ago then bought a 19" widescreen not knowing what to expect. Initially, I was surprised that it wasn't as big as I thought it would be. It was a little weird to begin with - the wide 1440x900 res was a far cry from the 800x600 res I was used to on the CRT. But after making adjustments to some Windows display settings to make it 'appear' more like the latter, I was very pleased. I soon grew to love it & I'll never go back to 4:3 unless I had no other choice. G
  • wolfman
    wolfman Posts: 3,225 Forumite
    Widescreen for me. Wouldn't go back to 4:3. It takes some getting used to, but once you do it feels much more natural due to the shape on the eyes and less boxy.

    20" should be fine and quite a nice step up from 15". 22" screens are becoming more common but can still cost a lot. I'd go for a nice 20" screen. Maybe a Dell.

    Or the Belinea 10 20 30W is a good monitor, has had lots of good reviews.
    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/AWESOME-GAMERS-TFT-BELINEA-20-1-102030W-WIDESCREEN_W0QQitemZ110160692112QQihZ001QQcategoryZ174QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
    You should be able to get something like that for about £130
    My brother has one, very nice monitor for the price.
    "Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha."
  • Inactive
    Inactive Posts: 14,509 Forumite
    Standard screen for me, remember you will get more visible screen from a standard screen on a like for like size basis.

    I cannot see any benefits in a Widescreen Monitor to be honest, they just seem to be the latest fashion thing.:rolleyes:
  • GoofyGAT
    GoofyGAT Posts: 1,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Inactive wrote: »
    I cannot see any benefits in a Widescreen Monitor to be honest, they just seem to be the latest fashion thing.:rolleyes:
    Don't be so narrow-monitored :p.

    You're saying that because you haven't used one &/or haven't made use of the benefits - see here for a few.

    But as pgilc1 nicely put it, 'i guess its up to you which suits your needs best'. G
  • wolfman
    wolfman Posts: 3,225 Forumite
    It's a more natural shape/aspect for the eyes. Once you get used to it you'll probably not want to go back to 4:3.
    "Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha."
  • Soulistic
    Soulistic Posts: 199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thanks for the help guys. I have now increased my budget to about £200... have narrowed my choices to:

    Dell 2007FP
    Samsung SM206BW
    Samsung SM225BW

    At the moment, I'm leaning on the 225BW.
  • Inactive
    Inactive Posts: 14,509 Forumite
    GoofyGAT wrote: »
    Don't be so narrow-monitored :p.

    You're saying that because you haven't used one &/or haven't made use of the benefits - see here for a few.

    But as pgilc1 nicely put it, 'i guess its up to you which suits your needs best'. G

    Obviously a biased review, you obviously didn't notice the top/bottom cropping on the W/S.
    :rolleyes:

    Why pay more, for less actual screen size?..beats me.

    To each his / her own, as they say... ;)
  • roddydogs
    roddydogs Posts: 7,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Inactive wrote: »
    Obviously a biased review, you obviously didn't notice the top/bottom cropping on the W/S.
    :rolleyes:

    Why pay more, for less actual screen size?..beats me.

    To each his / her own, as they say... ;)
    Surely all a W/s does is "stretch" the pic to fit, the feed from the Comp is not W/S or is it?:T
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.