We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking Fine Park direct uxbridge active for less car park

245

Comments

  • Flower_123 wrote: »
    Hi thanks for your help.


    I am now at the POPLA stage. I was wondering what I needed to attach to POPLA. I complained to BPA and then sent me an email back defending Park Direct, do I attach this? Also as they have inadequate signage should I go back and take a photo of the sign. I'm assuming I also attach the letters I received form Park Direct as they don't include the correct wording and were not send in the correct timescales?


    Thanks!


    the BPA may have defended park direct , but did you ask them to check if park direct gave a grace period on this car park , they will not give you the period , but will reply after being pushed that either there is or there is not.


    this email added to your appeal could prove that park direct were not abiding to there agreement with the BPA/DVLA


    get back on to the BPA and ask:


    Company: Park direct Ltd
    Site: xxxxxxx
    Time entered: (time), (date)
    Time left (time) (date)




    http://www.britishparking.co.uk/write/bpa_...ctober_2012.pdf

    page 10

    grace periods
    13.1 Your approach to parking management must allow a
    driver who enters your car park but decides not to park,
    to leave the car park within a reasonable period without
    having their vehicle issued with a parking charge notice.
    13.2 You should allow the driver a reasonable ‘grace period’
    in which to decide if they are going to stay or go. If the
    driver is on your land without permission you should still
    allow them a grace period to read your signs and leave
    before you take enforcement action.
    13.3 You should be prepared to tell us the specific grace
    period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask
    what it is.
    13.4 You should allow the driver a reasonable period to leave
    the private car park after the parking contract has ended,
    before you take enforcement action.


    2 counts , 1: grace period on entry , 2: grace period on leaving


    13.3 You should be prepared to tell us the specific grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is.

    Please will you contact Park direct and ask them for the grace periods , both on arrival and on leaving , before this ends up at POPLA

    thank you




    you can send that to [EMAIL="Steve.C@britishparking.co.uk"]Steve.C@britishparking.co.uk[/EMAIL]
  • Fruitcake
    Fruitcake Posts: 59,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In addition to the above, I would suggest you complain to the DVLA that the BPA are not supporting their own code of practice concerning grace periods which uses the word "must" in its membership requirements.


    Your approach to parking management must allow a driver who enters your car park but decides not to park, to leave the car park within a reasonable period without having their vehicle issued with a parking charge notice.




    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • yup , but let them (BPA) reply that either a grace period is in force or not


    grace period , = driver innocent
    no grace period = sanction points to the PPC , and a probable dropping of the charge




    let the BPA do the running around and sit back awaiting the comments


    either way , is a win win
  • Thanks its a shame that POPLA aren't taking appeals. id rather this was sorted asap.


    Is this ok to say to BPA? Thanks




    In response to your below email.





    This merely shows the vehicle on site but in the final photo, driver was there too. This is not evidence of parking, nor any contravention whatsoever. Within a 2 minute period the driver got out of the car read the sign, decided not to park and then left. No contract was formed.





    Taken from your code of practice:


    grace periods





    13.1 Your approach to parking management must allow a


    driver who enters your car park but decides not to park,


    to leave the car park within a reasonable period without


    having their vehicle issued with a parking charge notice.


    13.2 You should allow the driver a reasonable ‘grace period’


    in which to decide if they are going to stay or go. If the


    driver is on your land without permission you should still


    allow them a grace period to read your signs and leave


    before you take enforcement action.


    13.3 You should be prepared to tell us the specific grace


    period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask


    what it is.


    13.4 You should allow the driver a reasonable period to leave


    the private car park after the parking contract has ended,


    before you take enforcement action.








    Please will you contact Park direct and ask them for the grace periods , both on arrival and on leaving , before this ends up at POPLA.





    Furthermore, you state that the driver was observed by a parking attendant. Therefore there has been a breach of DVLA KADOE contract. No audit trail and no reasonable cause.





    Operators are only authorised under their KADOE contract with the DVLA to request keeper’s data if one of the following has arisen:





    - where a PCN on a windscreen has already been issued, in the case of a manned car park.


    OR


    - where the issue of a PCN by post is planned (without a windscreen PCN) - this being allowed only in the case of an ANPR camera car park.





    This case was neither. It lacks the required audit trail the DVLA insist upon from all AOS members. DVLA Inspectors enforce the rule: 'all vehicles should be ticketed where ANPR technology is not utilised'. This is a fact in the public domain via FOI:


    Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency - November 2012


    ‘‘I have since my visit taken further instruction on this procedure. Please would you note that if an operator has the ability to take a photograph of the offending vehicle they should also place a ticket on the vehicle and allow the transgressor time to pay before data is requested from DVLA. I advise that all vehicles should be ticketed where ANPR technology is not utilised.


    Summary of Issues: {Operator} to cease making vehicle keeper enquiries to DVLA where ANPR technology has not been used, and vehicles have not been ticketed. (Lack of Audit Trail) ’’





    This was not a car park with ANPR cameras. An operative took manual photographs there was no attempt to issue the penalty at the time of the alleged parking. So it is a non-ANPR case for which there MUST be a Notice to Driver served first and 28 days allowed for the driver to appeal or pay. In fact, 28 days was not allowed, a hybrid Notice was posted early, as soon as Park Direct got my data soon afterwards. There was no PCN served so this should never have progressed and it constitutes a DVLA and ICO rules breach - this matter is a common scam played out by Park Direct and it is the subject of several current complaints to the BPA.





    This makes a mockery of the DVLA KADOE contract, their ICO registration, the POFA, the BPA CoP and Consumer Protection regulations.


    I will be forwarding this email to DVLA.











  • no just the simple one liner I posted ,


    Company: Park direct Ltd
    Site: xxxxxxx
    Time entered: (time), (date)
    Time left (time) (date)




    http://www.britishparking.co.uk/write/bpa_...ctober_2012.pdf

    page 10

    grace periods
    13.1 Your approach to parking management must allow a
    driver who enters your car park but decides not to park,
    to leave the car park within a reasonable period without
    having their vehicle issued with a parking charge notice.
    13.2 You should allow the driver a reasonable ‘grace period’
    in which to decide if they are going to stay or go. If the
    driver is on your land without permission you should still
    allow them a grace period to read your signs and leave
    before you take enforcement action.
    13.3 You should be prepared to tell us the specific grace
    period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask
    what it is.
    13.4 You should allow the driver a reasonable period to leave
    the private car park after the parking contract has ended,
    before you take enforcement action.


    2 counts , 1: grace period on entry , 2: grace period on leaving


    13.3 You should be prepared to tell us the specific grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is.

    Please will you contact Park direct and ask them for the grace periods , both on arrival and on leaving , before this ends up at POPLA

    thank you



    no more detail to the BPA yet , they will twist the facts if they have the info , ie: if you say you overstayed 8 mins they will say the grace period is 7 mins




    the BPA are not on our side , they are a club , with paying members (PPCs) they say what the PPCs tell them to do


    let them give the info you need , then you can fire a full complaint in
  • Thanks so I sumply reply back with

    Please will you contact Park direct and ask them for the grace periods , both on arrival and on leaving , before this ends up at POPLA
    ?
    They already know the driver was there for 1 min 30 secs. They contacted park direct who informed them their attendant saw the driver leave the car park so a contract was formed and the grace period does not apply.

    Thanks
  • enfield_freddy
    enfield_freddy Posts: 6,147 Forumite
    edited 30 August 2015 at 8:39PM
    Flower_123 wrote: »
    Thanks so I sumply reply back with

    Please will you contact Park direct and ask them for the grace periods , both on arrival and on leaving , before this ends up at POPLA
    ?
    They already know the driver was there for 1 min 30 secs. They contacted park direct who informed them their attendant saw the driver leave the car park so a contract was formed and the grace period does not apply.

    Thanks


    " their attendant saw the driver leave the car park so a contract was formed and the grace period does not apply."


    is this in the unlisted section of the BPA handbook?


    I would start signing your letters "Usain Bolt" , 1 min amd 30 secs to leave the car park and return ?


    that's a lot of time for the warden to observe the vehicle




    ok get this in print , they have by there code of practice to allow a grace period


    let them try and say its 1 min and 29 secs , that will go down well (in print) to POPLa



    as posted previously


    grace period , = driver innocent
    no grace period = sanction points to the PPC , and a probable dropping of the charge




    let the BPA do the running around and sit back awaiting the comments


    either way , is a win win




    get the grace period , by alternate means , state the PPC , the car park BUT NOT the ticket number and send it via an alternative name/address
  • Ok thanks Ifor your help! I will ask in my name and from another name and email address.
  • This is the response i got from BPA

    As the parking charge notice was issued for stopping or waiting where stopping or waiting restrictions apply, a grace period is not applicable in this case.
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    So, they've obtained the registered keeper details from the DVLA for an incident that is not concerned with 'parking'?

    What was the actual word for word 'offence' listed on the ticket and other paperwork?

    Clearly the contract was not accepted. This case wouldn't last 10 minutes in a court.
    Je Suis Cecil.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.