We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
A couple of interesting items.
Comments
-
I believe it becomes illegal under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 when recordings are made available to a third party without consent. In this case we are not informed if consent was obtained, therefore, 'George' may have a case for civil action, which would be ironic given this chap's present predicament with PE!'People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool.' Wizard's first rule © Terry Goodkind.0
-
I believe it becomes illegal under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 when recordings are made available to a third party without consent. In this case we are not informed if consent was obtained, therefore, 'George' may have a case for civil action, which would be ironic given this chap's present predicament with PE!
That is exactly it.Je suis Charlie.0 -
No, you're missing the point. That Act has no validity because it's not mentioned in Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689, or the Bills of Exchange Act 1882. Also, he never signed anything to say he agreed to be bound by it.I believe it becomes illegal under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 when recordings are made available to a third party without consent. In this case we are not informed if consent was obtained, therefore, 'George' may have a case for civil action, which would be ironic given this chap's present predicament with PE!
Not only that, he (the real person) has created no joinder with the 'Mister' version of him, which as we all know is a legal fiction created by the authorities so that they can steal everyone's money.
So there is no way any Civil Action could possibly succeed against him, and if they ever tried it, the Judge would have to place himself under arrest for attempting to conduct proceedings without a jury.
It's marvellous, this FMOTL stuff, a whole new world of self delusion.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
I think he'd have been better off quoting from the Talmud and claiming that no contract was formed because there was no 'removing and handing over the shoe' (Ruth 4:7.)It's marvellous, this FMOTL stuff, a whole new world of self delusion.'People are stupid; they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so are all the easier to fool.' Wizard's first rule © Terry Goodkind.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards