We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Urgent advice needed
Comments
-
-
maninthestreet wrote: »So you were the victim of fraud? What actually happened?
I've never had a problem opening an account so I'd imagine it is more than meets the eye.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
-
OP - it would be extremely helpful to know the full details in one post that is clear on what has happened here. Both the events leading up to the Lloyds letter and exactly what was provided after. I had a similar post the other day.
If you do this I promise others will then have a better idea on your position and offer the best advice on accurate information. At the minute your getting responses which have not been based on the full detail and so may not be the best advice. It will save a lot of time and make it much easier to find a solution.
......
In my case they suspected fraud, issued 60 day notice on the account. I was declined from most places but got accepted with Barclays for a Cash Card account after making an appointment with them. If Lloyds placed a Cat 6 marker from what I gather this may be more difficult and they should have closed your account immediately? Again guessing here, full information would be very useful. Don't be shy you want a solution don't you?0 -
From the original post it appears the account was closed with no notice which is consistent with a proven fraud event and hence a CIFAS marker. What is the key here is 1) what the Lloyds letter said and 2) how Lloyds have registered it with CIFAS (i.e. what category CIFAS marker). Is it possible to scan the letter up (blanking out unique details)?
If you are indeed the innocent victim of the fraud, you should not have a CIFAS marker indicating you were the perpetrator, you should have a CIFAS marker indicating you were a victim, however Lloyds have history here (see this parliament debate about them):
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2011-11-15a.241.00
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards