We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

help please - planning clause issues

Can anyone please explain this to me in normal English?


I am in dispute with my local Council - I have purchased land beside my property. I then had neighbours complain about something else in my garden so I had to let them into my garden to measure up - the complaint has been ruled in our favour. BUT they saw that I had put a 'shed' on the new land which they are telling me I cant do as it was a clause when I purchased the new land and quoting the clause below which I just don't understand. The property itself is ex-LA (as many are these days) and our Solicitor said at the time that all ex-LA property have the same clause that you cant have a shed, boat, greenhouse or anything else on them....


Any comments/advice appreciated

CLAUSE:


Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes E and F and Part 2, Class A of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no buildings, enclosures or containers shall be erected on the application site nor shall any hard surface be provided except pursuant to the grant of planning permission on an application made in that regard
«1

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,408 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    it looks like it means you don't have normal permitted development rights and therefore any building/hard surface will require planning permission.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    the_r_sole wrote: »
    it looks like it means you don't have normal permitted development rights and therefore any building/hard surface will require planning permission.

    ....which you can still apply for retrospectively. ;)
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Move the shed. Invite them round to see. Move it back.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • patman99
    patman99 Posts: 8,532 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Photogenic
    You now have 2 choices.

    Choice 1 - Apply for PP for the shed.
    Choice 2 - Stick the shed on a trailer as the clause makes no mention of trailers or vehicles.
    Never Knowingly Understood.

    Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)

    3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)

  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    There is a discrepancy between what you say your solicitor says:

    " our Solicitor said at the time that all ex-LA property have the same clause that you cant have a shed, boat, greenhouse or anything else on them...."


    and what the clause says:

    "no buildings, enclosures or containers shall be erected on the application site nor shall any hard surface be provided except pursuant to the grant of planning permission on an application made in that regard."

    The first quote implies that PP can't be obtained at all, and the second, that it can, if approved.

    So there are two questions here; the first being what is the state of play regarding sheds etc on the other gardens nearby? Have they been allowed? If they have, it would be more difficult for the council to deny you one. However.....

    The second question is how the land was classed at the time of sale and how it's classed now. If it was agricultural land, it would have required PP for anything other than a movable field shelter, which would only have been granted if an agricultural need had been established. If it's been re-designated 'garden land' then the situation is as the paragraph above.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    craigmm wrote: »
    ... no buildings, enclosures or containers shall be erected on the application site
    No sheds or fenced off areas or containers can be put on the land
    craigmm wrote: »
    nor shall any hard surface be provided
    And you can't concrete it over, or lay down a big patio
    craigmm wrote: »
    except pursuant to the grant of planning permission on an application made in that regard
    Except if you've been granted planning permission, which you can apply for to do any of these things.

    So, the short answer is: You can, if you apply for planning permission and are granted it.
  • craigmm
    craigmm Posts: 10 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thank you for all the helpful comments


    We have the area fenced in as we received planning permission for that and as much as I like the idea of putting the shed on a trailer it is used to house fish equipment for my marine fish tank which is located within the house - absolutely no way we can move it :-( We also have the roof of the shed below the line of the fence so cant be seen by anyone from the road,
    We didn't know if the building would come under class E ?
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If the council excluded permitted development rights deliberately on your property's title docs, as in your original post, then the provisions of Class E don't apply, hence the need for PP.

    To deny you PP, however, the council will surely have to show good reason on planning grounds.
  • craigmm
    craigmm Posts: 10 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Ok thank you
  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    You don't actually have to move it - there is a case locally where a community allotment was facing a similar problem of getting planning permission for a greenhouse or shed. Just make it technically moveable.


    http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/Wheely-good-idea-beat-planning-red-tape/story-11349890-detail/story.html
    Adventure before Dementia!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.