We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ParkingEye Rebuttal
Options
Comments
-
nothing from bpa. Press, MP, Watchdog have shown no interest. I did put in the letter that my friend would buy a few shares in BL so she could turn up at their AGM to question the Board of Directors about their relationship with parasites.
But credit where it is due - the Chief Exec does not ignore his e-mails, unlike many others in these big firms.0 -
In the Beavis case, PE paid the Landowner £30,000 a year to farm their car park, and their Lordships took this into account. What sort of a financial arrangement did they have in this case?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Don't know what arrangement they have. From what BL told me, they brought PE in to stop all-day parkers (it was never really a problem as there were loads of old signs up but it was never enforced. The old signs just acted as deterrent in themselves).
I can only guess that PE are on site doing 'free management' but I would bet that BL are getting a slice.0 -
ezerscrooge wrote: »An update on one case where the British Land offered to cancel the charge, then backtracked because PE refused to cancel due to the case already being at POPLA.
A very strongly worded reply went in to the Chief Exec of BL and we've now had an email back stating that if the case is lost at POPLA then BL will pay the charge.
Wonder how long it will be before PE are given the boot from that car park now they are starting to cost BL money.
Never give up the fight. One more to go.
Hints of Co-op/CEL anyone?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
ezerscrooge wrote: »An update on one case where the British Land offered to cancel the charge, then backtracked because PE refused to cancel due to the case already being at POPLA.
A very strongly worded reply went in to the Chief Exec of BL and we've now had an email back stating that if the case is lost at POPLA then BL will pay the charge.
Wonder how long it will be before PE are given the boot from that car park now they are starting to cost BL money.
Never give up the fight. One more to go.
Forward that on to POPLA as evidence the principle wants the charge cancelled but is under the impression that they cannot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards