Student Finance and refund of Barclays a Additions and PPI income

I am supporting my sons application for a student loan as due to our joint incomes he is eligible for an additional loan for maintenance. Last year it was straight forward as we just had our incomes to declare and a negligible amount of interest on a small savings account. However during 2013-2014 which is the tax year we are reporting on, we received a lump sum refund for Barclays Additions and refund of Ppi charges. Both refunds included a proportion of simple interest at 8%. Should any of this be included as income for assessment purposes?

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,525 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I believe, happy to be corrected, the interest has to be declared to the tax man through the normal channels (though banks often take the tax off before they refund you) just as you would for interest on savings.

    The refund of fees is treated differently

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • My question refers to whether I need to declare the refunds and interest on the student loan application support for my son as income. Not to declare to the Inland Revenue as I have already paid tax on it.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,525 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Yes that is what I said - the interest is classed as income (hence you are taxed on it), the refund of premiums is not (though having it as savings can cause issues with those claiming benefits) so always worth a word with the actual organisation rather than asking on a forum

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.