We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
65 years old
Comments
-
rogerblack wrote: »This is an _extreme_ overgeneralisation.
Different people have different care needs, and this will map onto the different benefits - some may be entitled for one, not the other.
There is no clear picture, it's individual.
As one example, someone that requires help throughout the day with - say - communicating with others - may be entitled to AA, but may miss out on PIP as that engagement does not meet the bar of causing overwhelming distress, or causing a substantial risk to the person.
I agree with you that there are major differences. But what I would say that with PIP you know where you are as you have various descriptors to meet to gain points with.
With Attendance Allowance it is so 'woolly' that there are no descriptors just open ended definitions of the words used in the regulations. This can and does lead to people reading it in different ways including the DWP.
You make a statement: As one example, someone that requires help throughout the day. As most people making these claims don't have a clue about how AA works - what does requiring help THROUGHOUT the day actually mean? I have my own definition, but when I read up on it there were more different definitions. Does it mean CONTINUOUS or CONTINUING or even REGULAR?
With AA there is no 'I've got 8 points' it is entirely down to how you write your submission, the evidence you send in and how all of that is interpreted by a Decision Maker who may or may not be having a bad day.0 -
Throughout the day for the purposes of DLA/AA does not mean continuously. It means several-many times.0
-
rogerblack wrote: »Throughout the day for the purposes of DLA/AA does not mean continuously. It means several-many times.
Several means twice
Many means numerous.
Even that confuses me!
As I have said the definitions are so 'woolly' I doubt very many can actually complete the form in a format that meets what those definitions mean.0 -
several doesn't mean twice!
twice means twice!
if you went to buy 2 cups of tea, but asked for 'several' cups of tea...
you honestly think the person serving you would think you wanted 2?0 -
I was always taught that several = 7 or 8?Sealed pot challenge #232. Gold stars from Sue-UU - :staradmin :staradmin £75.29 banked
50p saver #40 £20 banked
Virtual sealed pot #178 £80.250 -
several doesn't mean twice!
twice means twice!
if you went to buy 2 cups of tea, but asked for 'several' cups of tea...
you honestly think the person serving you would think you wanted 2?
As per the Oxford dictionary:
SEVERAL
More than two but not many
A couple of times is normally twice; several times would be more than twice but not many
I'm getting confused now.
So what (in ordinary English please) does throughout mean?
Rogerblack says that it means: several-many times
I'm giving up on this as I don't think that there is any definition that means what it says - hence why rules relating to Attendance Allowance are so woolly.
I have to be honest my definition of throughout means all the way through the day or night - consistently.
But no doubt I'm wrong. Given that, how can anybody show that they should qualify for Attendance Allowance if they haven't got a clue what the defining rules are.
It's like playing football or cricket and not knowing what the rules of play are.0 -
-
Hi
I hope I'm getting my head around this
My official letter says
you are entitled to ...... to 17 Dec 2016 ( which is one month after I turn 60.
Do I assume then that at that point or prior I will be called in for a reassesment ?
Many thanks for all thegood advice
Ian
But you said earlier
"In 18 months time I reach the age of 65 " so could you clarify?0 -
benniebert wrote: »Not according to the Oxford dictionary it is.
7 or 8 would be said to be many.
several is more than 2 but NOT many.
in my opinion ...
a couple = 2
a few = 3 or 4
several = more than 4 but less than 10
many = over 10.
needing help 'several' times throughout the day means you need a substantial amount of help, but not constantly.
ie: needing help for short periods on multiple occasions0 -
missbiggles1 wrote: »But you said earlier
"In 18 months time I reach the age of 65 " so could you clarify?
Sorry was a typo was born 10/11/51
Ian0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards