We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Seller Lied on Property Information Form and to Solicitor Enquiries - PLEASE HELP!!
Options
Comments
-
1 - Vendor has done alterations (such as moving bathrooms, but not structural) but claimed in SPIF's he hasn't done alterations, so our solicitors didn't even ask about any building regs. But when we will be coming to sell the house the buyers might ask for BR docs which can cause issues selling the house.
Yes, you'll probably be asked for such docs if they're picked up by a buyer when you come to sell (depending on how old the alterations are by then).2 - The sellers might have done the renovation work themselves (as DIY) and they have not provided any warranty or completion documents.3 - Vendor falsely claimed his house has always been a 3-bed (in response to solicitor enquiries) and misled us to pay much higher price than 2-bed properties in the road, which we later discovered are in fact exactly the same size. This is clearly a mis-representation as he has been living there for 10 years and should know the history of the house. We don't know whether we can claim anything against such misrepresentation in the court ?Do I need to proof a "financial loss" when claiming against misrepresentation?4 - The fact that after completion the vendor disappeared all of the sudden and refused to give me his new address, is worrying and seems fishy.0 -
In your position, I would do the following:
1. Ask your solicitor to contact the seller's solicitor saying something like:
"In the SPIF and replies to pre-contract enquiries, the seller said....
However, it appears that.....
Please explain this."
(Hopefully, the seller's solicitor should have the seller's new address.)
If you are unhappy with the reply (or you get no reply), discuss next steps with your solicitor, and if you want to take it further:
2. Instruct an local RICS surveyor to value the property 'as if it was as described by the vendor' and as it actually is. You can then start a claim against the seller for the difference. (i.e. properties tend to sell for less if they don't have building regs sign off etc.)
Or, if the conversion doesn't comply with building regs, you could claim for the cost of making it compliant, from the seller.
Obviously, you will incur legal fees, survey fees etc - but you can get these back from the seller if your claim is successful.
Edit to add:
If you would have never bought the property at all, had the seller been honest...
Theoretically, you can sell the property (perhaps at a loss), buy another one and move - then claim your losses, removal expenses, EA fees and and all other costs back from the seller.
But you might have to convince a judge in court, that you would never have bought the property.
And I suspect that your legal bills would start getting very high.0 -
Would BR be required if the alterations didn't effect the bathroom or kitchen? If the work involved putting up a stud wall and putting in a door I don't think that actually requires either but I could be wrong.
Rooms need adequate escape windows. However many rooms you create, each need suitably sized and arranged escape windows/doors.
In contrast, moving the bathroom with stud walls etc. doesn't need the escape window. The only internal requirement would be for an extractor and a wash basin with the loo. Externally, adding to the underground drainage system would, but it sounds unlikely, given the apparantly modest size of the house.
If the OP bought with a mortgage, that would confirm whether the price paid was reasonable.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
Thanks for your replies so far!
In this case it's an internal alteration so planning permission is not required. Basically our several concerns are :
1 - Vendor has done alterations (such as moving bathrooms, but not structural) but claimed in SPIF's he hasn't done alterations, so our solicitors didn't even ask about any building regs. But when we will be coming to sell the house the buyers might ask for BR docs which can cause issues selling the house. But if we leave it too long until that time, it would be too late to claim against the current seller.
2 - The sellers might have done the renovation work themselves (as DIY) and they have not provided any warranty or completion documents. The job looks clean but behind the walls we don't know how standard they are and whether they can cause issues to the property.
3 - Vendor falsely claimed his house has always been a 3-bed (in response to solicitor enquiries) and misled us to pay much higher price than 2-bed properties in the road, which we later discovered are in fact exactly the same size. This is clearly a mis-representation as he has been living there for 10 years and should know the history of the house. We don't know whether we can claim anything against such misrepresentation in the court ?
Do I need to proof a "financial loss" when claiming against misrepresentation? (in this case the "loss" is not realised as of yet, but is effectively the £60k that we overpaid compared to another 2-bed house available in the street at the same time).
4 - The fact that after completion the vendor disappeared all of the sudden and refused to give me his new address, is worrying and seems fishy.
Many thanks!
Matt
If this is about a lack of planning permission/building regulations, then if needs be (doesnt sound like it), then you can get indemnity insurance when you sell, or apply retrospectively.
If this is about you failing to do your homework, and paying £60k extra for a house where someone has moved some walls to get a third bedroom, then it is tough sh*t!
A quick view on Google Earth would have shown it was the same size/footing as other two beds. It was entirely up to you to do your research when finding the right price to pay.
A house is worth what someone is willing to pay.
Edit: the seller may have bought it as a 3 bed so perhaps had no idea it had ever been changed.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Do I need to proof a "financial loss" when claiming against misrepresentation? (in this case the "loss" is not realised as of yet, but is effectively the £60k that we overpaid compared to another 2-bed house available in the street at the same time).
There is no loss, realised or otherwise.
As you stated the vendor did "major modifications" to convert from 2bed to 3bed. So it *is* a three bed and presumably your valuation did not throw any problems with what you paid vs the market value.
You must have know you were buying a small 3 bed instead of a large 2 bed given that the comparable houses on the street are presumably the same footprint.
You must have perceived it to be worth more than a 2 bed when you offered.
So, other than some missing paperwork you have lost nothing. You can still sell as a 3 bed with some missing paperwork which an indemnity insurance will cover, or you could get it regularised.
All irritating that you were misled, but not a hope of claiming a £60k "loss" or anything substantial IMHO.0 -
2. Instruct an local RICS surveyor to value the property 'as if it was as described by the vendor' and as it actually is. You can then start a claim against the seller for the difference.
No, a surveyor is likely to say that it isn't mortgageable, and might give you a value based on that, but in practice anybody would try to get it fixed by obtaining an indemnity policy or retrospective sign-off - and that's your actual loss.0 -
You have employed and paid a professional in house conveyancing who should (...) know far more than random people on a forum.
What does your solicitor say about this misrepresentation?0 -
No, a surveyor is likely to say that it isn't mortgageable, and might give you a value based on that, but in practice anybody would try to get it fixed by obtaining an indemnity policy or retrospective sign-off - and that's your actual loss.
If that's the case, that's what the surveyor will say in their report. i.e. it's worth £50 less, because that's the cost of an indemnity policy.
(But I very much doubt that is an accurate assessment.)0 -
You have employed and paid a professional in house conveyancing who should (...) know far more than random people on a forum.
What does your solicitor say about this misrepresentation?
I agree this should be true but frequently isn't. OP did you employ a solicitor or a random conveyancing outfit?0 -
If that's the case, that's what the surveyor will say in their report. i.e. it's worth £50 less, because that's the cost of an indemnity policy.
(But I very much doubt that is an accurate assessment.)
Firstly, I'm not sure how easily a surveyor could come up with a market value for stubbornly selling the house without building regulations, because there'll be nothing similar to compare it with - any seller would just get the indemnity policy. Or their purchaser would.
But even if they could assess such a value, the OP can't claim that's their loss - because they can sort it out much more cheaply.
Surveyors will normally just give a value which assumes that all the consents are available, it's left to you to figure out how much it costs to get the consents or indemnities.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards