POFA 2012 Para 8 (2(a)) period of parking

Stealthnet2004

thanks for your reply Henrik, that is intresting, I am starting to get the impression, that post Beavis COA ruling, POPLA appeals will start to take on a new dynamic? and therefore we may be in incharted waters?

henrik777

Attacking the contract and keeper liability is the best way until things settle down. It remains to be seen how the interpretation of Beavis will fall but if nobody includes it we'll never find out.

Anyone who has no discount in play or has a case where the keeper is not the driver essentially has a free shot to help find out.

Stealthnet2004

Excellent. I shall be posting my appeal as and when it is concluded. And hopefully will help for people taking on PPC’s post Beavis case (and until the supreme court ruling) I am guessing my shot at attacking the contract will be primarily that it’s inconceivable to enter into a contract as soon as you drive into the car park, when the signs are not at the entrance… as is my case.:)

Stealthnet2004

Update!

Popla Have come back to me, Appeal allowed, Based on no standing auth to issue tickets. I shall post accordingly in the popla thread, cheers peeps! power to the people!