We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
taking my car insurance to court
Comments
-
Your insurance will always act in the insurances interest.
That means the lowest legal fees possible and out.
Never let them defend you on Criminal charge driving matter where you can get jail.
You in the slammer is the cheap option.I do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
I think it will be difficult to prove liability at this late stage, but if I were you I would consult a no win no fee solicitor."A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
The way I read it was the third party took the OP to Court. OP's insurers did as they were supposed to do and defended the claim. The OP lost in Court and is complaining.
If he was that adamant he was not at fault, he should have instructed his own solicitors to bring a claim or include his losses in a counterclaim. His insurers aren't under any duty to do this as their only duty is to indemnify him in respect of third party claims.0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »Your insurance will always act in the insurances interest.
That means the lowest legal fees possible and out.
Never let them defend you on Criminal charge driving matter where you can get jail.
You in the slammer is the cheap option.
In more serious cases, a successful defence to a criminal charge might negate the chances of a successful civil claim.
It may well be in the insurers interests to get the driver good representation so I'm not convinced that your theory holds true.0 -
johncraiglynn wrote: »my damage is front left bumper thats it it snapped off from the left bar that secures it to the car there was a crack and scratch marksjohncraiglynn wrote: »I am now £8000 down for the rental car lost my job due to being off for 8weeks with whiplash and i dont drive anymore.
All he did was snap the bumper off a stationary 3 ton range rover with a 1.3 ton bmw and you incurred £8k of hire charges and 8 weeks off with whiplash and lost your job?0 -
There is nothing stopping the OP making his own claim against the other motorist and their insurers.0
-
He could have done but should have incorporated into the proceedings issued by the third party. Alternatively, his own solicitors should have issued first. That is, if he could find anyone to take his case on.0
-
OP was off 8 weeks with whiplash yet the other passengers were fine?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
