UKCPS 10 Day notice

enfield_freddy

no its well hidden from the public , I think it was Parky prank that showed it a few yrs ago

The_Deep

enfield_freddy wrote: »

no its well hidden from the public , I think it was Parky prank that showed it a few yrs ago

Oh dear, more misinformation from Fearless Freddie

Here it is

http://conkaisecurity.co.uk/codeofpractice.pdf

You really must stop telling porkies Freddie.

Fergie76

enfield_freddy wrote: »

no its well hidden from the public , I think it was Parky prank that showed it a few yrs ago

http://conkaisecurity.co.uk/codeofpractice.pdf

I have found a copy of Sep 14, IPC AOS COP and nowhere does it state, as you claim that, the Adjudicators will only see 20% of appeals or are punished, unless they refuse at least 80% of appeals:

THE INDEPENDENT PARKING COMMITTEE
ACCREDITED OPERATOR CODE OF PRACTICE
40
(e)
The date of issue of the Parking Charge.
c.
Appeals must clearly identify the grounds upon which the driver states that he is not
liable for the parking charge and be accompanied by any such evidence that the
driver would like to be considered during the appeal.
7.
Where the appeal is in respect of a Notice to Keeper under schedule 4 paragraph 8 of the
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 the following provisions apply.
a.
Appeals will only be accepted if they are received by the IAS within 21 days from the
date of rejection of the appeal to the Operator unless the appellant shows there are
exceptional circumstances for making the appeal out of time.
b.
Appeals will only be accepted where the following are identified:
(a)
the vehicle registration mark,
(b)
the name and a current serviceable address of the driver,
(c)
the creditor or operators name, and,
(d)
the land that the vehicle was parked on.
(e)
the date of issue of the Parking Charge.
(f)
the date of the rejection of the internal appeal.
c.
Appeals must clearly identify the grounds upon which the keeper states that he is
not liable for the parking charge and be accompanied by any such evidence that the
driver would like to be considered during the appeal.
8.
Upon receipt of a valid appeal, the IPC will notify the Operator of the grounds put forward
by the applicant within 7 days of receipt of the same. The Operator then has 5 working days
to provide a response to the appeal or to withdraw the charge should they not wish to
contest it. If no such response is received, the IAS will consider the case having regard to the
information that is available at the time.
9.
Appeals will only be allowed if it appears to the adjudicator that the Parking Charge is
unenforceable due to any applicable rule of law or contract.
10.
The IAS endeavours to notify both parties of the outcome of any appeal within 28 days from
the date of receipt the same. Whilst an appeal is being determined, any enforcement action
shall be suspended. However, where the appeal does not properly identify the driver and an
address for service, the operator or his agents may still apply for the keepers details from
DVLA where they consider it necessary to do so.
11.
It will only be deemed necessary to request the keeper details from DVLA when the driver is
unknown or not sufficiently clear, and delaying such an application would prevent the
creditor from providing the Notice to Keeper within the statutory period.
12.
You agree to abide by the decision of the IAS in any appeal.
13.
You agree to pay the relevant fee for any appea
l.
14.
It is a matter for the Operator whether to allow payment at a discounted rate where an
appeal is refused.

enfield_freddy

that is the code of practice issued to the press , not the true one


you continue believing that they are impartial and offer a good service , however some people know better


interestingly , the online version , is stated as being there first printed code of practice , however the version number or the date do not indicate this.




V.1.2.1 26/09/2014


no mention of the two rates of fees they charge (win/loose) , in fact a very cut down PDF

The_Deep

that is the code of practice issued to the press , not the true one

Well, if it is good enough for The Times it is good enough for me.

you continue believing that they are impartial and offer a good service , however some people know better

No I do not, I think that everyone here will agree that I have no illusions whatsoever about the lies and deceits perpetrated by the Red Cow Mob.

Freddie, your ill-considered poorly written tosh is making you a laughing stock, you seriously need to raise your game.

Fergie76

enfield_freddy wrote: »

that is the code of practice issued to the press , not the true one

So, provide a link to the "real" one.

enfield_freddy wrote: »

you continue believing that they are impartial and offer a good service , however some people know better

When have I ever said that?

waamo

The code of practice is also here. As far as I am aware this is the official one

http://media.wix.com/ugd/bd9e08_a2dad1a02f8ea46a76b78ba0982af9a3.pdf

Fergie76

That's an older one than the one linked above.

The_Deep

Fergie, such argument is the domain of the intellectually bereft.

When I questioned the Commie leaderene of Reading Borough Council about wasting my Council Tax passing motions supporting Hamas, she accused me of being uninterested in World Peace.

Logical Fallacies come easily to Fearless Fred and his ilk.

The_Deep

waamo wrote: »

The code of practice is also here. As far as I am aware this is the official one

http://media.wix.com/ugd/bd9e08_a2dad1a02f8ea46a76b78ba0982af9a3.pdf

The one I posted is dated 14 months later.i