We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Halifax stocks and shares ISA

Options
I have had a Halifax Stocks and Shares ISA since 2005. I converted it to cash in February 2014 when I bought a house.

I want to start using it again as I now have some savings again. However I have a few questions:

1) Here are the funds I could invest in: http://www.halifax.co.uk/investments/existing-customers/investments-purchased-in-branch/documentation/. I have used the FT website to look at performance over the last five years and performance over the last year. What techniques do you use to assess which funds to invest in going forward e.g. PE Ratio? I realise no-one has a crystal ball, but I think there is more to it than simply tossing a coin.
2) I am wandering if now is a good time to start using it with the general election being around the corner. The FT website charts do not go back as fare as 2010 so I am unable to see how the markets responded at previous general elections.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,650 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    1) Here are the funds I could invest in: http://www.halifax.co.uk/investments...documentation/.

    What you mean is that they are the funds are you limiting yourself to by choosing a lower quality option.
    2) I am wandering if now is a good time to start using it with the general election being around the corner.

    The UK election will have no noticeable impact on the stockmarket. It is a known event which is expected to have an undesirable outcome.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • w00519772
    w00519772 Posts: 1,297 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote: »
    What you mean is that they are the funds are you limiting yourself to by choosing a lower quality option.



    The UK election will have no noticeable impact on the stockmarket. It is a known event which is expected to have an undesirable outcome.

    Thanks. Can you clarify what you mean by a lower quality option? What is a higher quality option?
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,657 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    w00519772 wrote: »
    Thanks. Can you clarify what you mean by a lower quality option? What is a higher quality option?

    A fund supermarket that has many thousands of funds at a lower cost perhaps?

    Fidelity, Charles Stanley, Hargreaves Lansdown are just a few.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,650 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Banks have a long history of offering expensive and low quality investment funds. General rule of thumb is not to use a bank or building society for investments, pensions and insurance unless really good justification for doing so otherwise.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,154 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    w00519772 wrote: »

    ...
    What techniques do you use to assess which funds to invest in going forward e.g. PE Ratio? I realise no-one has a crystal ball, but I think there is more to it than simply tossing a coin.
    ......

    The most important consideration in investing is diversification. That means ensuring that your set of funds covers a very wide range of countries, sectors, company sizes, etc etc. As you gain experience you may wish to target higher or lower than average allocations to particular areas.

    If you are starting a portfolio from scratch I would suggest you begin with a general global fund or a multi asset fund. In both cases the manager will ensure that your money is very widely invested.

    Which particular fund you choose is then a secondary consideration. Many people go immediately for the one with lowest charges, others may look at long term performance, the history of the fund manager, details of the funds investments etc etc.
  • barak
    barak Posts: 1,258 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jimjames wrote: »
    A fund supermarket that has many thousands of funds at a lower cost perhaps?

    Fidelity, Charles Stanley, Hargreaves Lansdown are just a few.
    .....and others even include [!].....https://www.halifaxsharedealing-online.co.uk/_mem_bin/formslogin.asp?so=true&

    I suppose http://www.halifax.co.uk/investments/existing-customers/investments-purchased-in-branch/documentation/ is all that is offered if you walk into a high street branch.

    w00519772 - Have a look at http://www.comparefundplatforms.com for more possibilities.
    ".....where it is corrupt, purge it....."
  • w00519772
    w00519772 Posts: 1,297 Forumite
    barak wrote: »
    .....and others even include [!].....https://www.halifaxsharedealing-online.co.uk/_mem_bin/formslogin.asp?so=true&

    I suppose http://www.halifax.co.uk/investments/existing-customers/investments-purchased-in-branch/documentation/ is all that is offered if you walk into a high street branch.

    w00519772 - Have a look at http://www.comparefundplatforms.com for more possibilities.

    I am currently debating whether to use Hargreaves and Landsown or Charles Stanley. Charles Stanley is cheaper, however HL seems to be more comprehensive. Does anyone have any thoughts?
  • digannio
    digannio Posts: 335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    HL has bells and whistles, great website, all the background info you could want and fast and efficient on the phone but Charles Stanley are also good to deal with and the website is OK. I've had no problems with them. I would go with the cheapest one if I was making a straight choice between the two. I've got investments with both.
  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    2) I am wandering if now is a good time to start using it with the general election being around the corner.
    The general election was in May and won by the Conservatives. The next one will be in another 5 yrs - 2020.
  • noh
    noh Posts: 5,817 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BLB53 wrote: »
    The general election was in May and won by the Conservatives. The next one will be in another 5 yrs - 2020.

    The OP was made in March, two months before the last election.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.