We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Radio5 - houses to rise 40% in 4 years.
Options
Comments
-
Just found this old thread. Still not getting any better, is it? At least, not if you're a BTL merchant who bought at the peak!Been away for a while.0
-
Running Horse has a point.
I am a bear, but I still made a BTL property purchase last month. The sums can still add up.
Personally I still believe we have another down leg to come, post election. So above I think I stated -24% from peak within 18 months and we did that depending on your measure.
In the next 12-16 months I think we may see -15% from here. Which should bring us somewhere into the -30 to -35% from peak (Aug 2007).I can take no responsibility for the use of any free comments given, any actions taken are the sole decision of the individual in question after consideration of my free comments.
That also means I cannot share in any profits from any decisions made!;)0 -
The argument is surely the link between rent and purchase costs. Very simply, if rents equalled mortgage repayments over the term, then one would be stupid to rent. The fact that mortgages often lag rents makes buying even more attractive. Where mortgages outpace rents, then one can factor in an investment yield, tax free, to see which would be best. If renting still comes out ahead, then house prices are too high or, less likely, rents are too low.
Outside of short term flexibility, I have not seen a time when buying and retaining the property for some years did not prove a better option than renting. I do not see that maxim changing going forward.0 -
Turnbull2000 wrote: »Renting works on the continent...
But I do agree that they shouldn't whinge. They should f*cking riot.
I agree with the broad strokes of Turnbull's post. However, the problem, and the difference with some (but not all) continental countries is clustering.
In the UK, the well paying jobs are highly concentrated in London and the South East. Until the jobs are more evenly spaced out throughout the country, then nothing will make housing affordable for young people.
However, all changes have winners and losers, unwinding the London and South-East bubble will be good for the UK in general, however the beneficiaries of the bubble will aim to prevent change.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards