Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
R.Peston blog on inflation flooded with those disenchanted with housing
Comments
-
They were joined by the "gullible" in 1997'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
-
Jack_Johnson_the_acorn wrote: »Or public sector workers like me.... :beer:
So apart from public sector workers, the disabled, pensioners, children, those on low income, the unemployed, the sick, single parents, the not so bright people, what have labour ever done for us?Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
TBH, it's basically impossible to support Labour if you are either numerate or a net taxpayer. So Labour's support is effectively the poor and the stupid or at least those too stupid to understand the impact of what they're voting for.
Plenty of wealthy, intelligent people don't mind paying more tax for a fairer society and are grateful for the employment rights they enjoy thanks to Labour policies. Not everyone is motivated by personal greed. Society needs a balance between employers making money and employees who feel secure enough to spend their salaries.They are an EYESORES!!!!0 -
yes, there are also the Thatcherite 'I'm all right Jack' types too.
Ah yes, the derisive "I'm all right Jack" label that implies that the only way to not be derided thusly is to not vote in your own best interests. I wonder if that axiom applies to those who use the label? Surely that would mean the left should vote right in order to be considering others when taking action?If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.0 -
chucknorris wrote: »So apart from public sector workers, the disabled, pensioners, children, those on low income, the unemployed, the sick, single parents, the not so bright people, what have labour ever done for us?
maybe you should check up on the money paid to the disabled, the sick , single parents, pensioners, children and confirm it is at the highest level ever under this current government.
I'm not sure what exactly the patronising term 'not so bright' means.
Never however, let any facts get in the way of a good story
(OK I admit that the government has reduce child allowance for those earning over 50,000 so you are partly right there)
or maybe you were referring to the very high levels of sickness within the public sector
or the 50% increase in the disabled under labour (presumably due the shocking performance of the NHS)
and massive incentives Labour gave to encourage family breakdown and to encourage single parent
so a good question 'what did labour ever do for us'?0 -
Out,_Vile_Jelly wrote: »Society needs a balance between employers making money and employees who feel secure enough to spend their salaries.
Of course it does, I don't think any sensible person would argue with that, that for me isn't the issue. But what it doesn't need, is a situation where some people end up in either the same position or only marginally better off when they work, which can lead to a situation where SOME people are not motivated to work.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
maybe you should check up on the money paid to the disabled, the sick , single parents, pensioners, children and confirm it is at the highest level ever under this current government.
I'm not sure what exactly the patronising term 'not so bright' means.
Never however, let any facts get in the way of a good story
(OK I admit that the government has reduce child allowance for those earning over 50,000 so you are partly right there)
or maybe you were referring to the very high levels of sickness within the public sector
or the 50% increase in the disabled under labour (presumably due the shocking performance of the NHS)
and massive incentives Labour gave to encourage family breakdown and to encourage single parent
so a good question 'what did labour ever do for us'?
I knew someone would be along who either didn't have a sense of humour and/or hadn't seen Monty Python's Life of Brian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExWfh6sGyso
Does the phrase 'what have the Romans ever done for us' ring a bell?Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.3K Spending & Discounts
- 240.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 253.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards