We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Strange layout - small terraced house with acre of garden?
Comments
-
It looks like a lovely house but it's the most bizarre layout I've ever seen. I guess it would work if you lived alone and never had guests stay over.0
-
Ooh yes the floorplan does indeed indicate an odd upstairs layout. I don't think I could live with that - even as a single person. I have a 2 bedroom house myself and could manage (in my circumstances) with going through one bedroom to get to another one but I would still need to have the lounge as a distinct room in order to use for putting up any guests I had to stay (eg ie on converted sofa) and that lounge has the staircase coming right down into it, so that's not possible.
So, if I cant see how that house could work even just for myself, then I doubt I'd buy it - even though it certainly looks attractive and I'd love to have that garden (provided it was all mine obviously).
Add the fact I'd anticipate resale problems - from everyone else thinking the same things as to how the house itself would "work".0 -
I think both bedrooms are accessible from the 'study', it's probably an error in the floorplan (have seen many of those).
Seems pretty expensive even with the garden but I don't know about the area. The house is only 825 sq ft . Not having access to the garden from the house would be an issue for me because I want to cook etc while my toddler is in the garden and I can keep an eye on her.0 -
True...I've seen some obvious floorplan errors myself. I wouldn't bet on it...but worth giving the EA a ring and seeing if there is someone there who has actually visited the house and could say whether this is the case.
So...if the layout is a possible runner after all, there is still the question of the garden.
Vendors lie on that sometimes (voice of experience time) and, if there is any question whatsoever about whether a garden/piece of garden belongs to a property (ie not the absolute clear fence/wall/etc around it etc set-up that most houses have) then I would say it is as well to get the vendor to literally walk around the boundaries of what he says is his (as that would make it much harder for him to lie - particularly if you've got him on video doing it, courtesy of wanting to photograph the garden and he just "happens" to be walking around the boundaries as you are doing it;)).
Then confirm that fact by asking the neighbours what they believe is theirs (whether rightly or wrongly) and see if the two match.0 -
Rollinghills wrote: »I think both bedrooms are accessible from the 'study', it's probably an error in the floorplan (have seen many of those).
Not of that magnitude, surely? I agree it's about an unlikely a layout as anyone could dream up.
But it looks a relatively simple fix, if it really is like that.0 -
It would be interesting to look at the restrictive covenants on that garden. Because in theory you could build a very nice big house there, surrounded by an acre of garden, that sounds very yummy. Then sell the terraced house without any garden, the other houses have no garden so it shouldn't be difficult. Whether building on that garden is possible though is something else.
I guess the current owner would have realised this so probably the use of land is restricted.0 -
Not of that magnitude, surely? I agree it's about an unlikely a layout as anyone could dream up.
But it looks a relatively simple fix, if it really is like that.
I am only talking about the missing door from the study to bedroom 2, that is a very small error. We viewed a house with exactly the same error on the plan, missing door from the hallway to the dining room. After that I don't trust floorplans too much. I have seen all sorts of errors of bigger magnitude than this.0 -
Lacks the privacy one would wish for in a garden, plus it's north facing and impractical for watching kids.
Perhaps a real find for someone who wishes to use it for it's original purpose - for horses or is an outdoor type, thus doesn't mind the internal layout so much. Really nicely refurbished though.
Agree with above, must be restrictions on the land use, else one would just build on it and live in that.0 -
The description states that the study area leads to bedrooms 1&2 which in turn both lead to the bathroom - my guess is they missed a door on the floorplan.0
-
That's the Bismarck in photo 10, or possibly the Prinz Eugen."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards