We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wasn't in vehicle - in private car park - advice?!

2»

Comments

  • How does that work then? It seems to be a major design fault as vehicles will usually park up with hot/warm brakes which will then cool.

    I'd love to know the supposed physics behind that statement.



    It's a commonly-touted issue, particularly on disc-braked cars which use the pads as the handbrake (MX-5 on my driveway for example). Hot brake discs and pads cool and contract, which can release handbrake pressure sufficiently to allow the car to roll.


    Not a problem on a car with drums or with drum-in-disc handbrakes, because as the drum contracts it actually increases handbrake pressure.
  • loskie
    loskie Posts: 1,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    A known fault with those damned stupid electric parking brakes too.
  • alleycat`
    alleycat` Posts: 1,901 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Good reason to leave the car in gear then?

    As to the OP.
    If you think you are getting taken for a ride use your insurance.
  • It's a commonly-touted issue, particularly on disc-braked cars which use the pads as the handbrake (MX-5 on my driveway for example). Hot brake discs and pads cool and contract, which can release handbrake pressure sufficiently to allow the car to roll.

    When the handbrake isn't applied properly you mean :)
  • When the handbrake isn't applied properly you mean :)



    Well, if it's applied only to the point at which it *just* bites, then yeah. For those of us who gorilla the thing every time we park, it's not a problem.
  • Gloomendoom
    Gloomendoom Posts: 16,551 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    When the handbrake isn't applied properly you mean :)

    As has been said, it's a well known and long standing problem with hand brakes that use the service brake discs. Which why many manufacturers have reverted to using drums for the hand brake which get tighter as they cool.
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 5,842 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Will not her insurance go up even for a no fault claim?
    It might, or it might not. Even if it does, she might prefer to have it going up by a tenner next year and get her car fixed, rather than take a chance on some bloke who says "I'll get you the money next month, honest". I certainly would.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    leetrx wrote: »
    I said I would pay the cost on my next pay day but she insists on going through insurance. Any advice? I'm 21 and just got 4 years no claims and don't want to lose them and my insurance go up massively next year when I've done everything I can! Thanksj
    When you are liable for causing damage then you are responsible for all the third party's costs involved (not just the repair bill - eg car hire whilst repairs are carried out/taxi fares/any lost earnings etc)


    So you may want to let her put in a claim and if it's cost effective you can reimburse your insurer to keep all your NCD (as well as get another year awarded for the current year).


    If your insurer ends up paying for this then you won't lose all your NCD - if you had 4 years at the start of this year's policy you will have 2 years NCD at renewal.
  • arcon5
    arcon5 Posts: 14,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think it's a bit warped to say the woman has a right to go through ops insurer. It's more that op instructs the insurer (as it legally expected of her) to offer indemnity services to cover her in case of an incident.

    Problem is of course, the insurers are contractually and may even be legally obliged to payout the third party where you will not or cannot. And in this case you cannot. Waiting until payday sounds like a copout - even though I understand 100% that you may genuinely pay her and don't have the money. Remembering she has a right to be compensated with minimal inconvenience to her.

    Your best bet is to either stump up the money quicker or pay back the insurer.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    edited 17 March 2015 at 4:36PM
    arcon5 wrote: »
    I think it's a bit warped to say the woman has a right to go through ops insurer
    Can't see anyone has. (And she does anyway - most insurers operate innocent third party claims departments for just such cases!)


    But what has been (correctly) posted is that the woman has a right to go "through insurance" (rather than have to deal directly with the OP) - assuming she has comprehensive cover.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.