We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Faulty electronic product that could have killed me
Comments
- 
            You're stuffed I'm afraid - if you wanted a warranty, you'd have to buy from a business. The seller nor the manufacturer have to do anything.0
- 
            A pretty dramatic headline ....but you used it again after it "nearly killed" you!0
- 
            mattyprice4004 wrote: »You're stuffed I'm afraid - if you wanted a warranty, you'd have to buy from a business. The seller nor the manufacturer have to do anything.
 It's a shame that this technicality allows companies to make shoddy productsKwai Chi
 Professional Video blogger0
- 
            
- 
            How about the Sale of goods act? Is that the same deal?
 As you bought it second hand, your only rights are with the seller.
 You would need to prove that the seller was fully aware of the fault when it was sold.
 You. Have NO rights with the manufacturer, so anything they do is a gesture of good will, so be nice to them!
 We had the same problem, but with an £8k 2 year old BMW motorbike bought from a private seller. It has cost us nearly £2k to fix, doing the work ourselves. Labour would have been another £2k!!Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
 Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
 No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0
- 
            It's a shame that this technicality allows companies to make shoddy products
 It doesn't.
 Product liability provisions contained in the Consumer Protection Act means that producers are liable for damages caused to users if their products are defective. A product is a defective product if it the safety of it is not such that people would be generally entitled to expect. (ie, a knife isn't defective if it cuts someone because it is made for cutting and you wouldn't expect it to be so safe that it doesn't cut you, but a disposable safety razor that took a massive chunk out of your face because the housing didn't function properly would be defective).
 Product liability is not a contract issue - it is a tort and as such to claim for losses caused by a defective product you don't have to prove any relationship/contract between you and the producer. You don't even have to own the product - you could be a bystander that is injured/suffers loss due to someone else's use of the product. You do have to actually have some losses though - 'it could have killed me - but didn't' = you get nothing.
 http://www.businesscompanion.info/en/quick-guides/product-safety/unsafe-goods-liabilityCommon sense?...There's nothing common about sense!0
- 
            Bit of a leap from 'I grazed my knee a bit' to 'I COULD HAVE DIIIIED!!!!' if you want my opinion.....0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
          
          
         
 
         
