IAS decisions at a real court

eddy1

here are some of the comments that we had from this wonderful service, we are due in court at end of month, interesting to see if they are produced

"[Whilst I accept that the Appellant purchased their ticket before the parking charge was issued the requirement on the sign is to display the ticket not just to purchase it. As there is no evidence it was displayed before the charge was issued the appeal is dismissed".

eddy

Hot_Bring

Half_way wrote: »

If I was to receive an ipc ticket any so called ias reply would be greeted with a barrage of complaints, together with a put up or shut up letter to the ppc and landowner

I still have a 'ticket' open with Sussex Security Solutions ( who bizarrely operate out of the same address as Capital 2 Coast ! ). IAS rejected it so I sent a rude barrage of emails to IAS pointing out they were corrupt and their links to Gladstones etc. Strangely I've never heard anything from IAS nor SSS. :rotfl:

bazster

Hot_Bring wrote: »

I still have a 'ticket' open with Sussex Security Solutions ( who bizarrely operate out of the same address as Capital 2 Coast ! ).

Not bizarre at all give that both businesses are owned by the same geezer, [Name removed by Forum Team]. He also has Ethical(!) Group Ltd. in his little stable of south coast parking parasites.

Somewhat incongruously he is also in the hospitality business with Old Selden Farm Bed & Breakfast, and Selden Barn Weddings, so anyone considering accepting his hospitality at one of those establishments may wish to re-consider knowing what kind of person they are about to do business with.

Even more incongruously he repeatedly (and unsuccessfully so far) stands as a prospective councillor in local elections in Sussex, so anyone seeing his name come up on a ballot may wish to publicise his unsavoury business interests through the local press,

Hot_Bring

bazster wrote: »

Not bizarre at all give that both businesses are owned by the same geezer, [Name removed by Forum Team]. He also has Ethical(!) Group Ltd. in his little stable of south coast parking parasites.

Somewhat incongruously he is also in the hospitality business with Old Selden Farm Bed & Breakfast, and Selden Barn Weddings, so anyone considering accepting his hospitality at one of those establishments may wish to re-consider knowing what kind of person they are about to do business with.

Even more incongruously he repeatedly (and unsuccessfully so far) stands as a prospective councillor in local elections in Sussex, so anyone seeing his name come up on a ballot may wish to publicise his unsavoury business interests through the local press,

What is even more ironic is that he stood for the Lib Dems in 2013 under the banner 'for a fairer Britain' :eek:

And of course the nomination papers show his REAL address which company records don't. I wonder if he likes pizza and skips ( as in the things you put rubbish in ) ?

And for those that think Sussex is a bit of a broad area to find his nomination papers - he stood in Rustington.

bazster

Hot_Bring wrote: »

What is even more ironic is that he stood for the Lib Dems in 2013 under the banner 'for a fairer Britain' :eek:

And of course the nomination papers show his REAL address which company records don't. I wonder if he likes pizza and skips ( as in the things you put rubbish in ) ?

And for those that think Sussex is a bit of a broad area to find his nomination papers - he stood in Rustington.

If you mean the address in Rustington that includes the name of a tree, that appears to be a holiday let owned by {Edited by forum team}. Presumably he uses it as an address of convenience to make it look like he lives in the ward, whereas his real home appears to be across the border in Angmering and Findon: http://www.seldenfarm.co.uk/

The_Deep

So, to sum up, no event where an IAS appeal which has been dismissed has yet been taken to court by a PPC, but there may be one (eddy1, post 12),

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5046397

in the near future.

bazster

The_Deep wrote: »

So, to sum up, no event where an IAS appeal which has been dismissed has yet been taken to court by a PPC, but there may be one (eddy1, post 12),

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5046397

in the near future.

I'm pretty sure I recall at least one court case following a refused IAS appeal, but whether the IAS adjudication actually made an appearance in the court room I've no idea.

Ryan_Bryan

The sooner something is done about this pathetic extension of the whole grubby, disgusting, shabby, shameful con, the better.
This post on Pep today defies all logic and reason.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=97620

enfield_freddy

yup I copied/pasted that from this forum , as I thought it was so funny


I think the OP should write nicely asking for them to read and reassess there dismissal , if they still think its correct , the should start court proceedings




reading that in court would make them laughing stocks , the magistrate should ask the adjudicator to be present , as he has questions for him.

HO87

enfield_freddy wrote: »

yup I copied/pasted that from this forum , as I thought it was so funny

I think the OP should write nicely asking for them to read and reassess there dismissal , if they still think its correct , the should start court proceedings

reading that in court would make them laughing stocks , the magistrate should ask the adjudicator to be present , as he has questions for him.

Freddy, magistrates sit in the Magistrates Court (clue's in the name) whereas PPC cases are heard in the Small Claims Court the domain of District and Deputy District Judges. (Yes I know that District Judges also sit as what used to be known as stipendiary magistrates but that doesn't turn SCC cases into cases heard by magistrates.

Not that I'd mind a PPC being hauled before the odd magistrate or two especially if they were then committed to the Crown Court for sentence.