We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
how many people on here are millionaires (including "on paper")
Comments
-
The top 1% is £530K I believe, so yes, it still means something.
You're creating a strawman; No one is saying being a millionaire doesn't mean something, what's been said is that it doesn't mean what it used to.
Being a millionaire 20 years ago was something you couldn't possibly do by getting a typical job and working to retirement. You either needed to come from a rich family, get a extremely good job and save hard, or be one of the tiny faction of people who founded a multi-million pound firm.
Now being a millionaire is unusual but not a level of wealth that couldn't be achieved in a normal working lifetime.
What it means in terms of lifestyle has also changed hugely. In the 90's it would mean a couple living in a very expensive property who could comfortably afford luxury holidays, premium new cars every other year, designer clothing, a cleaner, an au-pair etc etc. A millionaire now is probably £10-20k a year better off than the average person. That's a big difference but only a fraction of the difference it was back then.Having a signature removed for mentioning the removal of a previous signature. Blackwhite bellyfeel double plus good...0 -
.....Often one (usually the woman) has found a job (like teaching assistance) to work around picking up the kids from school.
I'm not saying that's everyone, but career couples are not the norm.....
Depends how you define "career".
Mrs LM is a prime example. Leaving school at 16, she worked as a lowly clerk for a few years but managed to save £100 by the time she was 21. Enough to pay for a honeymoon if parents would pay for the actual wedding.
At this age, she gave up the job and married a penniless 21 year old student entering his final year. She 'temped' for a while, thus bringing in a few shillings to help pay for hiring a black & white television, and allowing for a bit of meat to add to the beans on toast.
Every time yours' truly was shunted around the country in a "career move" she found herself unemployed again, having to 'temp' again. The futility of this - coupled with the extremely low wages - made such activity rather meaningless, when she could be a "lady who lunched", or an unpaid volunteer at a charity.....
However, after such a career, this lady finds herself, now to have joined the millionaire club.
Personally, I blame the Married Women's Property Act 1870. Should we not mark the forthcoming 150th anniversary of it by repealing it?0 -
I'll be a millionaire once my interest rate gamble has come to an end!
:money::beer::j:D;)0 -
However, after such a career, this lady finds herself, now to have joined the millionaire club.
Sorry if I'm being thick, but how did she do this?
If you are saying your career has made 2 millionaires, then I think that's extraordinary - but great all the same.0 -
MILLIONAIRES = 12 characters.
You can put me down as a MIL (almost). More than a MI, but not a MIL.0 -
......If you are saying your career has made 2 millionaires, then I think that's extraordinary - but great all the same.
I don't find it too extraordinary, since it is merely a matter of mathematics. Anyone who, by and large, spends below 70% of gross income and invests the rest well in one's own property, pensions, and equities eventually cannot fail to have wealth which exceeds total lifetime career gross earnings.
Despite all the wishes of the Devon lad, I have been unable to stop the value of the house running into 7 figures. Against my wishes, Mrs LM had to be on the purchase transaction to get a mortgage. Now that it has been paid off, I have felt it rather trite to insist that she signs her half back to me. Other assets need to be in her name for legitimate tax avoidance purposes.
She will very soon be the proud owner of an extra £20K of 'Granny Bonds'.
However, please don't fret too much on my behalf. She doesn't know where a lot of the money is, and she certainly doesn't know the passwords. Her strengths do not include financial management and quite frankly, she doesn't know her Artemis High Income from her Legg Mason Global Equity.0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »MILLIONAIRES = 12 characters.
You can put me down as a MIL (almost). More than a MI, but not a MIL.
I put you as a !!!!!! ;-)0 -
TheBlueHorse wrote: »I put you as a !!!!!! ;-)
And all that without even seeing a photo.
You must be using the "if it has a pulse" yardstick0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »MILLIONAIRES = 12 characters.
You can put me down as a MIL (almost). More than a MI, but not a MIL.
Don't put it all in the bank. That is exactly 50% towards being BANKRUPT.0 -
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »Don't put it all in the bank. That is exactly 50% towards being BANKRUPT.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards