Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Is £250K for a 1 bed flat about right price for West London in traditional terms?
elliotwave
Posts: 35 Forumite
If the median wage for London is about £40K then there are plenty of folks earning 50K+ so at 4 times salary + a healthy deposit ...£250K is in traditional terms fairly priced?
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
0
Comments
-
If a one bed flat rocks your boat then I guess it offers good value.0
-
elliotwave wrote: »I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot?
There's probably a lot of couples earning £50-60k between them too.0 -
elliotwave wrote: »If the median wage for London is about £40K then there are plenty of folks earning 50K+ so at 4 times salary + a healthy deposit ...£250K is in traditional terms fairly priced?
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
if your question is simply, is the current relationship between london HPs & london pay pretty much the same as it ever was? then emphatically no, it's trivially easy to prove, with referenced to published data, that the relationship that existed even a few years ago has been completely smashed.
whether or not this means that prices are [your words] "about right" or "fairly priced" is another matter & a much harder question.FACT.0 -
I'm not saying the market is not overvalued in general, I think it is, but there still seems to be some 'fair' value in terms of multiples of median wages. I live in west London which is probably the worst of all and the properties I am looking at are £250K to £300K (but are only one beds)0
-
Wages dont really matter, look at rental yields to see whether prices are getting ridiculous or not.Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0
-
A quarter of a million for a one bedded flat? Just let that sink in.I am insane and have 4 mortgages - total mortgage debt £200k. Target to zero = 10 years! (2030)0
-
elliotwave wrote: ».... but there still seems to be some 'fair' value in terms of multiples of median wages.
I've bought several houses in my lifetime. I believe I paid on (or about) the fair value for each of them.
At no stage in the buying process, however, did I find the need (or benefit) in waving my payslip, or that of Mr Median down the road, to justify a lower price.
I sold my 9 year old XJ6 last year. Got £6,800 which I considered 'fair'. That's a year in which 2,476,435 new cars were registered in UK. Just imagine that there had been a worlwide car strike, and only about 250,000 had been made for the previous 5 years. The 'fair price' for my car would have been a bit higher wouldn't you think?0 -
hildosaver wrote: »A quarter of a million for a one bedded flat? Just let that sink in.
That would be in a cheap area, I wouldn't want to buy a flat in such a cheap area. I'm not saying that I wouldn't buy in a cheap area (if I was in the market to buy) but it would have to be a house in such an area. But obviously I understand one can only buy what they can afford, the point I am making is that £250k is very cheap.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Wages dont really matter, look at rental yields to see whether prices are getting ridiculous or not.
based on yields London property is certainly overpriced.
anything much higher than a 4.0% gross yield has become rare in the better areas. a good number of people have clearly been buying/not selling with further price increases, rather than fundamentals, in mind. That and/or being super myopic in terms of interest rates. I don't know what the best part of a year of flattish prices might do to dent this belief.FACT.0 -
Too much emphasis on income multiples is a misnomer. There is much more to price than this. I meet a high proportion of people with cash earnings, so official earnings statistics are highly misleading.
In the end demand is extremely robust and London is seen as a safe haven investment (just as I predicted in 2008 when all the bears scoffed at this notion UK was a safe haven).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards