We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is £250K for a 1 bed flat about right price for West London in traditional terms?

elliotwave
Posts: 35 Forumite
If the median wage for London is about £40K then there are plenty of folks earning 50K+ so at 4 times salary + a healthy deposit ...£250K is in traditional terms fairly priced?
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
0
Comments
-
If a one bed flat rocks your boat then I guess it offers good value.0
-
elliotwave wrote: »I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot?
There's probably a lot of couples earning £50-60k between them too.0 -
elliotwave wrote: »If the median wage for London is about £40K then there are plenty of folks earning 50K+ so at 4 times salary + a healthy deposit ...£250K is in traditional terms fairly priced?
I guess it boils down to the numbers of people in London earning 50K or above...probably quite a lot? Could argue that the corresponding property type should above starter level ... 2 bed rather than 1 bed...
if your question is simply, is the current relationship between london HPs & london pay pretty much the same as it ever was? then emphatically no, it's trivially easy to prove, with referenced to published data, that the relationship that existed even a few years ago has been completely smashed.
whether or not this means that prices are [your words] "about right" or "fairly priced" is another matter & a much harder question.FACT.0 -
I'm not saying the market is not overvalued in general, I think it is, but there still seems to be some 'fair' value in terms of multiples of median wages. I live in west London which is probably the worst of all and the properties I am looking at are £250K to £300K (but are only one beds)0
-
Wages dont really matter, look at rental yields to see whether prices are getting ridiculous or not.Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0
-
A quarter of a million for a one bedded flat? Just let that sink in.I am insane and have 4 mortgages - total mortgage debt £200k. Target to zero = 10 years! (2030)0
-
elliotwave wrote: ».... but there still seems to be some 'fair' value in terms of multiples of median wages.
I've bought several houses in my lifetime. I believe I paid on (or about) the fair value for each of them.
At no stage in the buying process, however, did I find the need (or benefit) in waving my payslip, or that of Mr Median down the road, to justify a lower price.
I sold my 9 year old XJ6 last year. Got £6,800 which I considered 'fair'. That's a year in which 2,476,435 new cars were registered in UK. Just imagine that there had been a worlwide car strike, and only about 250,000 had been made for the previous 5 years. The 'fair price' for my car would have been a bit higher wouldn't you think?0 -
hildosaver wrote: »A quarter of a million for a one bedded flat? Just let that sink in.
That would be in a cheap area, I wouldn't want to buy a flat in such a cheap area. I'm not saying that I wouldn't buy in a cheap area (if I was in the market to buy) but it would have to be a house in such an area. But obviously I understand one can only buy what they can afford, the point I am making is that £250k is very cheap.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Wages dont really matter, look at rental yields to see whether prices are getting ridiculous or not.
based on yields London property is certainly overpriced.
anything much higher than a 4.0% gross yield has become rare in the better areas. a good number of people have clearly been buying/not selling with further price increases, rather than fundamentals, in mind. That and/or being super myopic in terms of interest rates. I don't know what the best part of a year of flattish prices might do to dent this belief.FACT.0 -
Too much emphasis on income multiples is a misnomer. There is much more to price than this. I meet a high proportion of people with cash earnings, so official earnings statistics are highly misleading.
In the end demand is extremely robust and London is seen as a safe haven investment (just as I predicted in 2008 when all the bears scoffed at this notion UK was a safe haven).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards