We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

"Generation Rent" now on the Wacky Backy

12346»

Comments

  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    I think MPs should be paid 150% of whatever they can prove they earned in the previous 3 years.

    This will mean unequal pay but the job itself is somewhere between social worker and junior paralegal, i.e. it requires very little skill - we know this because Labour stood the 18-year-old Red Princess Emily Wedgwood-Benn at the last GE. If an 18-year-old can be an MP as a first-ever job, how hard can it be?
  • Linda_D_2
    Linda_D_2 Posts: 1,891 Forumite
    thequant wrote: »
    Who would live in a House like this? Campaigners' plan to turn Parliament into 364 flats and move MPs to Hull would save £120million over five years
    Campaign group proposed to move Parliament to Hull and convert building
    Palace of Westminster would be transformed into 364 affordable flats
    One-bedroom flat in iconic building would be available for £258 per week
    Swimming pool would be built in iconic debating chambers
    Generation Rent suggested relocating MPs and Lords to Hull, Yorkshire
    Housing campaign group believes this would save £120m over five years
    Some 335 MPs rent homes and claim expenses, costing £5.21m in 2013

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2975493/Who-live-House-like-Campaigners-plan-turn-Parliament-364-flats-MPs-Hull-save-120million-five-years.html


    "Generation Rent" now on the Wacky Backy?

    Does that mean you're having to get Roger the Lodger stoned before he'll do the dastardly deed with you?:D
  • ..... i.e. it requires very little skill - we know this because Labour stood the 18-year-old Red Princess Emily Wedgwood-Benn at the last GE. If an 18-year-old can be an MP as a first-ever job, how hard can it be?

    I think she's a special case. She would have had years and years of 'home tutoring' even from the age of 5. By the age of 18, she would know 100% what her mission is.....
    • Tax the rich.
    • Nationalise Railways, all transport, Docks, Banks, Telecomms, Royal Mail, Utilities, and Construction.
    • Let the Unions run the country.
    OK, that might still be a little bit 'centrist' but don't worry. Ed will whip her into shape to be a real Socialist.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    I don't think he made it up!

    He could well be referring to the incidence of the diminutive Hazel 'Chipmunk' Blears, the former Labour MP for Salford.

    Feeling hungry (I assume) one evening she decided that the taxpayer should cough up £2.50 for a Kit Kat from the minibar. Almost certainly, the item could have been found more cheaply by the act of wandering to the local 'open all hours' shop.....

    Only made No 4 on the list of the 25 most ludicrous claims for some reason. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5581638/MPs-expenses-25-most-ludicrous-claims.html

    Surely spending £2.50 on Kitkat has to be more ludicrous then spending 67p on a packet of Ginger Crinkle biscuits?
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    antrobus wrote: »
    Surely spending £2.50 on Kitkat has to be more ludicrous then spending 67p on a packet of Ginger Crinkle biscuits?

    I disagree. The public have been jealously eyeing the provision of free biscuits to politicians since well before the expenses scandal. Any politician worth his salt will have known buying biscuits for a meeting could only end in tears.

    The Kit-Kat simply represents poor value whereas the Ginger Crinkles were a politically toxic choice.
  • wotsthat wrote: »
    Maybe we need 600 of these..

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-31679475

    Don't think I'll bother being an MP. Don't fancy the pay cut or having to worry about the DM exposing me for putting a meal deal and an extra kit-kat on expenses on the way to a meeting. The potential employers seem a bit odd too - they want champagne performance on a lemonade budget.

    No wonder so many oddballs are attracted to the job.




    BS after BS after BS after BS, day after day after month after month after year after year......

    Who are you trying to kid, who the f*** is going to pay you more than £20k let alone £67k, you spend 99% of your over rated and opinionated life on here :rotfl:
  • PixelPound
    PixelPound Posts: 3,069 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I think MPs should be paid 150% of whatever they can prove they earned in the previous 3 years.

    This will mean unequal pay but the job itself is somewhere between social worker and junior paralegal, i.e. it requires very little skill - we know this because Labour stood the 18-year-old Red Princess Emily Wedgwood-Benn at the last GE. If an 18-year-old can be an MP as a first-ever job, how hard can it be?

    Does this include their time as an MP? So be a pay escalator? If just from before, what about MP's who are in the job 10 20 years?
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    BS after BS after BS after BS, day after day after month after month after year after year......

    Who are you trying to kid, who the f*** is going to pay you more than £20k let alone £67k, you spend 99% of your over rated and opinionated life on here :rotfl:

    I just love the thought of you permanently seething because you made a tit of yourself on the internet a few years ago. Get over it - at your time of life it can't be good for you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.