We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
my dad paid for my pip implants and section 75 claim refused
Comments
-
Dads always know best eh!
But he is right, so go with it
And good luck!0 -
nicholaswitchell wrote: »It could be argued that the benefit the father had was in seeing his daughter as a much more confident person.
Clutching at straws really, but if thats all you have...
This "benefit" argument is a nonsense IMHO. The MSE link refers to it and points to an FOS decision that doesn't support the case.
The law and the FOS decisions just make it clear - the CC account holder has to be in contract with the merchant. If somebody else is in contract with the merchant and payment is made on a CC, then no help from S75 because the chain is broken.
This is the reasoning used in Grumber's cases below:
Note that the "benefit" argument wasn't even raised/discussed.0 -
Yes thank you all, after reading them I don't think anything will come of it..0
-
nicholaswitchell wrote: »Dads always know best eh!
But he is right, so go with it
And good luck!
Thanks, we have nothing to lose so anything is a bonus.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards