MSE News: Test case may force airlines to stop putting flight delay claims on hold 25 February 2015 at 2:24PM in Flight Delay Compensation 8 replies 2.4K views

Former_MSE_Helen

A test case is being heard today to determine whether flight delay claims can be put on hold pending an ECJ decision...

Read the full story:

Test case may force airlines to stop putting flight delay claims on hold




Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.

111KAB

MSE .... always first with the news! Pity they do not pay as much attention to 'cleaning' up the cluttered Flight Delay Compensation threads.

Justice13075

Here Here!

NoviceAngel

I seem to recall reading first hand accounts on here from some of the MSE members on todays Court case.

Former_MSE_Helen

Airlines may find it harder to wriggle out of paying compensation for technical faults, following a court ruling today ...

Read the full story:

Passengers closer to victory in flight delays battle




Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.

111KAB

MSE .... here is a copy of the judgement which Novice Angel provided to YOUR forum prior to your post ....


https://www.scribd.com/doc/257008909/Allen-v-Jet2


and here is the Bott & Co press release ...


http://www.bottonline.co.uk/press-releases/bott-win-as-airline-application-for-stays-is-refused

thomascrook123

Hi, can anyone give me some advice - a month ago, the judge in my case advised Thomas Cook that they needed to provide evidence as to why they shouldn't pay me compensation following the Huzar rejected appeal. Thomas Cook wrote back this week saying that they want to put the claim on hold because of the KLM case. Now that a judge in Liverpool has rejected this, do I need to submit a default judgement to the court or will the court automatically respond to Thomas Cook's letter and say no?

NoviceAngel

111KAB wrote: »

MSE .... here is a copy of the judgement which Novice Angel provided to YOUR forum prior to your post ....


https://www.scribd.com/doc/257008909/Allen-v-Jet2


and here is the Bott & Co press release ...


http://www.bottonline.co.uk/press-releases/bott-win-as-airline-application-for-stays-is-refused

Indeed, there has been a thread on here for a while, with all the forumites thoughts on the Allen case

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5182256

111KAB

thomascrook123 wrote: »

Hi, can anyone give me some advice - a month ago, the judge in my case advised Thomas Cook that they needed to provide evidence as to why they shouldn't pay me compensation following the Huzar rejected appeal. Thomas Cook wrote back this week saying that they want to put the claim on hold because of the KLM case. Now that a judge in Liverpool has rejected this, do I need to submit a default judgement to the court or will the court automatically respond to Thomas Cook's letter and say no?

Proactive - send a copy of the recent Judgement to your court and ask them to request TC pay the requisite amount (plus interest/court fees) into your account by way of BACS within the next 14 days.